Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 1976–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Chapman v. Californiayellow2 sentences2009See generally Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 22 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967) (setting forth the harmless constitutional error rule). 6. 2009See generally Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 22 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967) (setting forth the harmless constitutional error rule). 6. | 2 | 3 |
Nix v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2007Nix v. Williams, supra, 467 U. S. at 444, n. 4 . 3 The return of the executed search warrant lists as one of the items seized pursuant to the search warrant from the motel room “1 wooden cotton swab containing suspected blood from door handle.” Since that piece of evidence was not seized during the warrantless search but was seized pursuant to a valid search warrant based upon information wholly independent of the illegal entry, it is subject to the “independent source” doctrine and meets the criteria for admissibility thereunder. 2007Nix v. Williams, supra, 467 U. S. at 444, n. 4 . 3 The return of the executed search warrant lists as one of the items seized pursuant to the search warrant from the motel room “1 wooden cotton swab containing suspected blood from door handle.” Since that piece of evidence was not seized during the warrantless search but was seized pursuant to a valid search warrant based upon information wholly independent of the illegal entry, it is subject to the “independent source” doctrine and meets the criteria for admissibility thereunder. | 1 | 1 |
Milton v. Wainwrightgreen1 sentence1981See Milton v. Wainwright, 407 U. S. 371 (92 SC 2174, 33 LE2d 1) (1972); Null v. Wainwright, 508 F2d 340 (1975). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Schneble v. Florida
green
2 sentences1978The standard for harmless constitutional error is the balancing test set out in Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427 (1972). 1978The standard for harmless constitutional error is the balancing test set out in Schneble v. Florida, 405 U. S. 427 (1972). | 2 | 1976–1978 |
Harrington v. California
green
2 sentences1976I agree that while the *63 appellant has been denied a federal constitutional right of counsel, no reversal is required under the doctrine of harmless constitutional error where the state carries the burden of proof under Schneble v. Florida, 405 U. S. 427 (1972); Harrington v. California, 395 U. S. 250 (1969); Chapman v. California, 386 U. S. 18 (1907). 1976I agree that while the *63 appellant has been denied a federal constitutional right of counsel, no reversal is required under the doctrine of harmless constitutional error where the state carries the burden of proof under Schneble v. Florida, 405 U. S. 427 (1972); Harrington v. California, 395 U. S. 250 (1969); Chapman v. California, 386 U. S. 18 (1907). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.