Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Yancey v. Stategreen2 sentences2013See Romer v. State, 293 Ga. 339, 343 (2), n. 4 ( 745 SE2d 637 ) (2013); Yancey v. State, 292 Ga. 812, 817 (2), n. 9 ( 740 SE2d 628 ) (2013). 2013See Romer v. State, 293 Ga. 339, 343 (2), n. 4 ( 745 SE2d 637 ) (2013); Yancey v. State, 292 Ga. 812, 817 (2), n. 9 ( 740 SE2d 628 ) (2013). | 2 | 2 |
Romer v. Stategreen2 sentences2013See Romer v. State, 293 Ga. 339, 343 (2), n. 4 ( 745 SE2d 637 ) (2013); Yancey v. State, 292 Ga. 812, 817 (2), n. 9 ( 740 SE2d 628 ) (2013). 2013See Romer v. State, 293 Ga. 339, 343 (2), n. 4 ( 745 SE2d 637 ) (2013); Yancey v. State, 292 Ga. 812, 817 (2), n. 9 ( 740 SE2d 628 ) (2013). | 2 | 2 |
Chapel v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Chapel v. State, 270 Ga. 151, 155 (4) ( 510 SE2d 802 ) (1998), our Supreme Court held that “a comment upon a defendant’s silence or failure to come forward ... will not be allowed even where the defendant has not received Miranda warnings and where he takes the stand in his own defense.” In recent opinions, the Supreme Court of Georgia noted that former OCGA § 24-3-36 was repealed by the new Evidence Code, but the Court specifically did not rule on Mallory’s continued viability under the new Code because that issue was not squarely before the Court. 2013Chapel v. State, 270 Ga. 151, 155 (4) ( 510 SE2d 802 ) (1998), our Supreme Court held that “a comment upon a defendant’s silence or failure to come forward ... will not be allowed even where the defendant has not received Miranda warnings and where he takes the stand in his own defense.” In recent opinions, the Supreme Court of Georgia noted that former OCGA § 24-3-36 was repealed by the new Evidence Code, but the Court specifically did not rule on Mallory’s continued viability under the new Code because that issue was not squarely before the Court. | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Bagleyred2 sentences2007Bagley, supra, 473 U. S. at 682-683 (plurality opinion of Blackmun, J.). 2007Bagley, supra, 473 U. S. at 682-683 (plurality opinion of Blackmun, J.). | 2 | 2 |
Moreno v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1998"The inflammatory nature of racial bias is such that it requires careful shepherding in its presentation to the jury. [Cit.]" Moreno v. U.S., 482 A.2d 1233, 1238 (III) (D.C.App.1984). 1998“The inflammatory nature of racial bias is such that it requires careful shepherding in its presentation to the jury. [Cit.]” Moreno v. United States, 482 A2d 1233, 1238 (III) (D.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.