Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 California opinions name it 2 courts 1967–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Steelegreen2 sentences2008And the more specifically the defense requests certain evidence, thus putting the prosecutor on notice of its value, the more reasonable it is for the defense to assume from the nondisclosure that the evidence does not exist, and to make pretrial and trial decisions on the basis of this assumption.’ [Citation.] Accordingly, in determining whether evidence was material, ‘the reviewing court may consider directly any adverse effect that the prosecutor’s failure to respond might have had on the preparation or presentation of the defendant’s case.’ [Citation.]” (In re Steele (2004) 32 Cal.4th 682, 2008And the more specifically the defense requests certain evidence, thus putting the prosecutor on notice of its value, the more reasonable it is for the defense to assume from the nondisclosure that the evidence does not exist, and to make pretrial and trial decisions on the basis of this assumption.’ [Citation.] Accordingly, in determining whether evidence was material, ‘the reviewing court may consider directly any adverse effect that the prosecutor’s failure to respond might have had on the preparation or presentation of the defendant’s case.’ [Citation.]” (In re Steele (2004) 32 Cal.4th 682, | 1 | 1 |
In re Browngreen2 sentences2008And the more specifically the defense requests certain evidence, thus putting the prosecutor on notice of its value, the more reasonable it is for the defense to assume from the nondisclosure that the evidence does not exist, and to make pretrial and trial decisions on the basis of this assumption.’ [Citation.] Accordingly, in determining whether evidence was material, ‘the reviewing court may consider directly any adverse effect that the prosecutor’s failure to respond might have had on the preparation or presentation of the defendant’s case.’ [Citation.]” (In re Steele (2004) 32 Cal.4th 682, 2008And the more specifically the defense requests certain evidence, thus putting the prosecutor on notice of its value, the more reasonable it is for the defense to assume from the nondisclosure that the evidence does not exist, and to make pretrial and trial decisions on the basis of this assumption.’ [Citation.] Accordingly, in determining whether evidence was material, ‘the reviewing court may consider directly any adverse effect that the prosecutor’s failure to respond might have had on the preparation or presentation of the defendant’s case.’ [Citation.]” (In re Steele (2004) 32 Cal.4th 682, | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Marriage of Cueva
green
1 sentence2015(See In Re Marriage of Cueva (1978) 86 Cal.App.3d 290 ; Keech, supra, 75 Cal.App.4th 860 ; Alan S., supra, 172 Cal.App.4th 238 .) We discuss the court’s findings on these factors in turn. b. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Alan S. v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.
green
2 sentences2015(See In Re Marriage of Cueva (1978) 86 Cal.App.3d 290 ; Keech, supra, 75 Cal.App.4th 860 ; Alan S., supra, 172 Cal.App.4th 238 .) We discuss the court’s findings on these factors in turn. b. 2015(See In Re Marriage of Cueva (1978) 86 Cal.App.3d 290 ; Keech, supra, 75 Cal.App.4th 860 ; Alan S., supra, 172 Cal.App.4th 238 .) We discuss the court’s findings on these factors in turn. b. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
In Re Marriage of Keech
green
2 sentences2015(See In Re Marriage of Cueva (1978) 86 Cal.App.3d 290 ; Keech, supra, 75 Cal.App.4th 860 ; Alan S., supra, 172 Cal.App.4th 238 .) We discuss the court’s findings on these factors in turn. b. 2015(See In Re Marriage of Cueva (1978) 86 Cal.App.3d 290 ; Keech, supra, 75 Cal.App.4th 860 ; Alan S., supra, 172 Cal.App.4th 238 .) We discuss the court’s findings on these factors in turn. b. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
United States v. Bagley
red
2 sentences2004And the more specifically the defense requests certain evidence, thus putting the prosecutor on notice of its value, the more reasonable it is for the defense to assume from the nondisclosure that the evidence does not exist, and to make pretrial and trial decisions on the basis of this assumption." ( Id. at pp. 682-683, 105 S.Ct. 3375 (plur. opn. of Blackman, J.).) Accordingly, in determining whether evidence was material, "the reviewing court may consider directly any adverse effect that the prosecutor's failure to respond might have had on the preparation or presentation of the defendant's 2004And the more specifically the defense requests certain evidence, thus putting the prosecutor on notice of its value, the more reasonable it is for the defense to assume from the nondisclosure that the evidence does not exist, and to make pretrial and trial decisions on the basis of this assumption." ( Id. at pp. 682-683, 105 S.Ct. 3375 (plur. opn. of Blackman, J.).) Accordingly, in determining whether evidence was material, "the reviewing court may consider directly any adverse effect that the prosecutor's failure to respond might have had on the preparation or presentation of the defendant's | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Kirk v. Regents of University of California
green
1 sentence1981Such requirements may promote compelling state interests on the one hand, or, on the other, may not be penalties upon the exercise of the constitutional right of interstate travel.” (Id., at p. 638, fn. 21 [ 22 L.Ed.2d at p. 617 .) In concluding that California’s durational residency requirement did not infringe upon the right to interstate travel as provided for in the United States Constitution, the court in Kirk v. Regents of University of California, supra, 273 Cal.App.2d 430, 440 , noted: “While we fully recognize the value of higher education, we cannot equate its attainment with food, c | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Shapiro v. Thompson
red
1 sentence1981Such requirements may promote compelling state interests on the one hand, or, on the other, may not be penalties upon the exercise of the constitutional right of interstate travel.” (Id., at p. 638, fn. 21 [ 22 L.Ed.2d at p. 617 .) In concluding that California’s durational residency requirement did not infringe upon the right to interstate travel as provided for in the United States Constitution, the court in Kirk v. Regents of University of California, supra, 273 Cal.App.2d 430, 440 , noted: “While we fully recognize the value of higher education, we cannot equate its attainment with food, c | 1 | 1981–1981 |
People v. Kraps
green
2 sentences1967The governing law is stated in People v. Kraps, 238 Cal.App.2d 675 , at pages 679-680 [ 48 Cal.Rptr. 89 ] : “The search which followed the arrest was proper because it was incident to a lawful arrest. [Citations.] Defendant urges that the search was unlawful because it lacked a definite purpose and was unreasonable in its scope. *166 Specifically defendant argues that since the arrest was for a traffic offense there was no purpose justifying the search. 1967The governing law is stated in People v. Kraps, 238 Cal.App.2d 675 , at pages 679-680 [ 48 Cal.Rptr. 89 ] : “The search which followed the arrest was proper because it was incident to a lawful arrest. [Citations.] Defendant urges that the search was unlawful because it lacked a definite purpose and was unreasonable in its scope. *166 Specifically defendant argues that since the arrest was for a traffic offense there was no purpose justifying the search. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.