Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Hawaii opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple of Hawai'i, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appealsgreen2 sentences2007See Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple of Hawai'i, Inc. v. ZBA, 9 Haw.App. 298, 303 , 837 P.2d 311, 313 (1992), overruled on other grounds, Rivera v. Dept. of Labor & Indus. 2007See Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple of Hawai`i, Inc. v. ZBA, 9 Haw.App. 298, 303 , 837 P.2d 311, 313 (1992), overruled on other grounds, Rivera v. Dept. of Labor & Indus. | 2 | 2 |
KOREAN BUDDHIST TEMPLE v. Zoning Bd.green2 sentences2007See Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple of Hawai'i, Inc. v. ZBA, 9 Haw.App. 298, 303 , 837 P.2d 311, 313 (1992), overruled on other grounds, Rivera v. Dept. of Labor & Indus. 2007See Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple of Hawai`i, Inc. v. ZBA, 9 Haw.App. 298, 303 , 837 P.2d 311, 313 (1992), overruled on other grounds, Rivera v. Dept. of Labor & Indus. | 2 | 2 |
Moore v. Smith-Snagggreen1 sentence2019The Faison court went on to observe that such a rule is “the prevailing approach in other jurisdictions,” 32 N.E.3d at 405 , citing, inter alia, Moore v. Smith-Snagg, 793 So.2d 1000, 1001 (Fla. Dist. | 1 | 1 |
Dorothy M. Faison v. Tonya Lewisgreen2 sentences2019Therefore, a void deed is not subject to a statutory time bar.” Faison v. Lewis, 32 N.E.3d 400, 407 (N.Y. 2015). 2019The Faison court went on to observe that such a rule is “the prevailing approach in other jurisdictions,” 32 N.E.3d at 405 , citing, inter alia, Moore v. Smith-Snagg, 793 So.2d 1000, 1001 (Fla. Dist. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Donis v. Connecticut Board of Examiners in Podiatry
green
2 sentences1992Donis v. Board of Examiners, 207 Conn. 674 , 542 A.2d 726 (1988). 1992Donis v. Board of Examiners, 207 Conn. 674 , 542 A.2d 726 (1988). | 2 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.