5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1882–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kettells v. Assurance Co. of Americagreen1 sentence2014Kettels v. Assurance Co., 644 N.W.2d 299, 300 (Iowa 2002) (holding plaintiffs’ receipt of judgment proceeds waived the right to appeal the award in an attempt to gain more). | 1 | 1 |
Robinson v. Varnergreen2 sentences1939See Robinson v. Varner, 199 Iowa 109 , 201 N. W. 70 . 1939See Robinson v. Varner, 199 Iowa 109 , 201 N. W. 70 . | 1 | 1 |
Phillips v. Germongreen1 sentence1882See Phillips v. Germon, 43 Iowa, 101 ; C., R. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Younker Brothers, Inc. v. Zirbel
green
2 sentences2003Id. at 276 , 12 N.W.2d at 223-24 ; accord 14 Am.Jur.2d Certiorari § 18, at 640-41 (2000) (“Generally, a writ of certiorari will not issue if there is another adequate remedy, such as an appeal or writ of error, an action at law or in equity....”). 2003Id. at 276 , 12 N.W.2d at 223-24 ; accord 14 Am.Jur.2d Certiorari § 18, at 640-41 (2000) (“Generally, a writ of certiorari will not issue if there is another adequate remedy, such as an appeal or writ of error, an action at law or in equity....”). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Reuter v. City of Oskaloosa
green
2 sentences1972In Reuter, 253 Iowa at 772-773 , 113 N.W. 2d at 719 , after stating that the general policy of the law is against piecemeal appeals, we approved the general rule stated in an annotation in 114 A.L.R. 759 , “* * that an order or decree which dismisses an action as to a part only of the defendants, all of whom are charged to be jointly liable and the interests of all of whom are identical and not severable, is not a final judgment from which appeal or writ of error will lie while the case remains un-disposed of in the lower court as to other defendants.” Reference is also made in Reuter to this 1972In Reuter, 253 Iowa at 772-773 , 113 N.W. 2d at 719 , after stating that the general policy of the law is against piecemeal appeals, we approved the general rule stated in an annotation in 114 A.L.R. 759 , “* * that an order or decree which dismisses an action as to a part only of the defendants, all of whom are charged to be jointly liable and the interests of all of whom are identical and not severable, is not a final judgment from which appeal or writ of error will lie while the case remains un-disposed of in the lower court as to other defendants.” Reference is also made in Reuter to this | 1 | 1972–1972 |
McGuire v. City of Cedar Rapids
green
1 sentence1972The foregoing statements were repeated in McGuire, 189 N.W.2d at 595 . | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.