8 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1902–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Louckgreen2 sentences2006Co. v. Louck, 243 Ind. 17, 21-22 , 181 N.E.2d 855, 856-57 (1962) (citations omitted). 2006Co. v. Louck, 243 Ind. 17, 21-22 , 181 N.E.2d 855, 856-57 (1962) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Sierp
green
2 sentences1981State v. Sierp, (1973) 260 Ind. 57 , 292 N.E.2d 245 , and cases there cited. “ ‘Generally speaking, under the common law as understood and administered in this country, the state or United States had no right to an appeal or writ of error in criminal cases. 1981State v. Sierp, (1973) 260 Ind. 57 , 292 N.E.2d 245 , and cases there cited. “ ‘Generally speaking, under the common law as understood and administered in this country, the state or United States had no right to an appeal or writ of error in criminal cases. | 3 | 1980–2008 |
State Ex Rel. Jackson, Attorney General v. Middleton
green
2 sentences1960Jackson, Attorney General v. Middleton, supra (1939), 215 Ind. 219, 224 , 19 N. E. 2d 470 . 1960Jackson, Attorney General v. Middleton, supra (1939), 215 Ind. 219, 224 , 19 N. E. 2d 470 . | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Northern Indiana & Southern Michigan Telegraph & Cable Co. v. Peoples Mutual Telephone Co.
green
1 sentence1916Note. — Reported in 111 N. E. 4 . | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Williams v. Hert
green
1 sentence1905Gillespie v. Rump (1904), 163 Ind. 457 , and cases cited; Williams v. Hert (1901), 157 Ind. 211 , 87 Am. | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Gillespie v. Rump
green
1 sentence1905Gillespie v. Rump (1904), 163 Ind. 457 , and cases cited; Williams v. Hert (1901), 157 Ind. 211 , 87 Am. | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Cavanaugh v. Smith
green
1 sentence1902Rep. 677 ; Cavanaugh v. Smith, 84 Ind. 380 ; Reid v. Mitchell, 93 Ind. 469 ; Freeman, Judg., §§334, 287-9; Bigelow, Estop., 148-9.” In his section 334 Freeman states the same principles thus: “A party to a judgment feeling himself aggrieved thereby may, in a proper case, either move that it be vacated, or prosecute an appeal or writ of error, or maintain a suit in equity to enjoin its enforcement. | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Reid v. Mitchell
neutral
1 sentence1902Rep. 677 ; Cavanaugh v. Smith, 84 Ind. 380 ; Reid v. Mitchell, 93 Ind. 469 ; Freeman, Judg., §§334, 287-9; Bigelow, Estop., 148-9.” In his section 334 Freeman states the same principles thus: “A party to a judgment feeling himself aggrieved thereby may, in a proper case, either move that it be vacated, or prosecute an appeal or writ of error, or maintain a suit in equity to enjoin its enforcement. | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.