Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1935–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Cedar Rapids v. Linn Countygreen2 sentences2024The State relies on this court’s opinions in City of Cedar Rapids v. Linn County, 267 N.W.2d 673, 673 (Iowa 1978) (stating that court costs “are taxable only to the extent provided by statute”), and Grant v. Iowa District Court, 492 N.W.2d 683, 685 (Iowa 1992) (explaining that “[t]he district court lacks inherent power to tax court costs”). 2024The State relies on this court’s opinions in City of Cedar Rapids v. Linn County, 267 N.W.2d 673, 673 (Iowa 1978) (stating that court costs “are taxable only to the extent provided by statute”), and Grant v. Iowa District Court, 492 N.W.2d 683, 685 (Iowa 1992) (explaining that “[t]he district court lacks inherent power to tax court costs”). | 2 | 2 |
Grant v. Iowa District Court for Hancock Countygreen2 sentences2024The State relies on this court’s opinions in City of Cedar Rapids v. Linn County, 267 N.W.2d 673, 673 (Iowa 1978) (stating that court costs “are taxable only to the extent provided by statute”), and Grant v. Iowa District Court, 492 N.W.2d 683, 685 (Iowa 1992) (explaining that “[t]he district court lacks inherent power to tax court costs”). 2024The State relies on this court’s opinions in City of Cedar Rapids v. Linn County, 267 N.W.2d 673, 673 (Iowa 1978) (stating that court costs “are taxable only to the extent provided by statute”), and Grant v. Iowa District Court, 492 N.W.2d 683, 685 (Iowa 1992) (explaining that “[t]he district court lacks inherent power to tax court costs”). | 2 | 2 |
Hudson v. Michigangreen1 sentence2017Consequently, exceptions to the exclusionary rule have formed over time “involv[ing] the causal relationship between the unconstitutional act and the discovery of evidence.” Strieff, 136 S. Ct. at 2061 (discussing exceptions to the rule); see also Hudson, 547 U.S. at 591-93 (discussing evolution of exceptions to the rule). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Nitchergreen1 sentence2017See State v. Nitcher, 720 N.W.2d 547, 553 (Iowa 2006). 12 2056, 2061 (2016) (“But the significant costs of this rule have led us to deem it ‘applicable only . . . where its deterrence benefits outweigh its substantial social costs.’” (citations omitted)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Dudleygreen1 sentence2016See State v. Dudley, 766 N.W.2d 606, 624 (Iowa 2009) (“As an acquitted defendant, Dudley may have been liable for the costs of his defense, but certainly not for the court costs.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Crouse v. Crouse
green
2 sentences1935In Crouse v. Crouse, 210 Iowa 508 , 229 N.W. 850 , this statute, section 12032 set out in the objections of the administrator, was under consideration by this court, and likewise under the same title in 214 Iowa 725 , 240 N.W. 213, 215 . 1935In Crouse v. Crouse, 210 Iowa 508 , 229 N.W. 850 , this statute, section 12032 set out in the objections of the administrator, was under consideration by this court, and likewise under the same title in 214 Iowa 725 , 240 N.W. 213, 215 . | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Crouse v. Crouse
neutral
2 sentences1935In Crouse v. Crouse, 210 Iowa 508 , 229 N.W. 850 , this statute, section 12032 set out in the objections of the administrator, was under consideration by this court, and likewise under the same title in 214 Iowa 725 , 240 N.W. 213, 215 . 1935In Crouse v. Crouse, 210 Iowa 508 , 229 N.W. 850 , this statute, section 12032 set out in the objections of the administrator, was under consideration by this court, and likewise under the same title in 214 Iowa 725 , 240 N.W. 213, 215 . | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.