Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Van v. Portneuf Medical Centergreen2 sentences2013Black places heavy emphasis on the suspected violation language, contending that he is entitled to the protection of I.C. § 6-2104(l)(a) even though a violation of law is not confirmed, but merely suspected, citing our holding in Van, 147 Idaho at 559 , 212 P.3d at 989 . 2013Black places heavy emphasis on the suspected violation language, contending that he is entitled to the protection of I.C. § 6-2104(l)(a) even though a violation of law is not confirmed, but merely suspected, citing our holding in Van, 147 Idaho at 559 , 212 P.3d at 989 . | 2 | 3 |
State v. Vegagreen2 sentences1998See also State v. Vega, 110 Idaho 685, 686 , 718 P.2d 598, 599 (Ct.App.1986). 1998See also State v. Vega, 110 Idaho 685, 686 , 718 P.2d 598, 599 (Ct.App.1986). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Phillip James Morgan
green
2 sentences2018ANALYSIS On appeal, Horton argues the district court erred when it concluded the officer had reasonable suspicion to stop Horton's vehicle for a suspected violation of I.C. §§ 49-430 and/or 49-456 because State v. Morgan , 154 Idaho 109 , 294 P.3d 1121 (2013) instructs that these sections of the Idaho Code only apply to vehicles registered within the state of Idaho. 2018ANALYSIS On appeal, Horton argues the district court erred when it concluded the officer had reasonable suspicion to stop Horton's vehicle for a suspected violation of I.C. §§ 49-430 and/or 49-456 because State v. Morgan , 154 Idaho 109 , 294 P.3d 1121 (2013) instructs that these sections of the Idaho Code only apply to vehicles registered within the state of Idaho. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Pinson
green
2 sentences1998He relies upon State v. Palmer, 110 Idaho 142 , 715 P.2d 355 (Ct.App.1985), and State v. Pinson, 104 Idaho 227 , 657 P.2d 1095 (Ct.App. 1983), where we held that: (a) before conducting a warrantless search of a parolee’s person or property, a parole officer must have some reasonable grounds to believe that the individual had violated a condition of his parole, and (b) the search must be reasonably related to disclosure or confirmation of the suspected violation. 1998He relies upon State v. Palmer, 110 Idaho 142 , 715 P.2d 355 (Ct.App.1985), and State v. Pinson, 104 Idaho 227 , 657 P.2d 1095 (Ct.App. 1983), where we held that: (a) before conducting a warrantless search of a parolee’s person or property, a parole officer must have some reasonable grounds to believe that the individual had violated a condition of his parole, and (b) the search must be reasonably related to disclosure or confirmation of the suspected violation. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Palmer
green
2 sentences1998He relies upon State v. Palmer, 110 Idaho 142 , 715 P.2d 355 (Ct.App.1985), and State v. Pinson, 104 Idaho 227 , 657 P.2d 1095 (Ct.App. 1983), where we held that: (a) before conducting a warrantless search of a parolee’s person or property, a parole officer must have some reasonable grounds to believe that the individual had violated a condition of his parole, and (b) the search must be reasonably related to disclosure or confirmation of the suspected violation. 1998He relies upon State v. Palmer, 110 Idaho 142 , 715 P.2d 355 (Ct.App.1985), and State v. Pinson, 104 Idaho 227 , 657 P.2d 1095 (Ct.App. 1983), where we held that: (a) before conducting a warrantless search of a parolee’s person or property, a parole officer must have some reasonable grounds to believe that the individual had violated a condition of his parole, and (b) the search must be reasonably related to disclosure or confirmation of the suspected violation. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.