Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Doylegreen1 sentence2020See, e.g., United States v. Doyle, 650 F.3d 460, 473 (4th Cir. 2011) (‘‘mere . . . nudity . . . even child nudity, does not constitute child pornography [under] Virginia law’’); United States v. Hill, supra, 459 F.3d 970 (‘‘not all images of nude children are pornographic’’); United States v. Amirault, supra, 173 F.3d 33 (‘‘mere nudity’’ does not make image lascivious under federal law). 8 In Griesbach, the search warrant was based on a suspected violation of the Wisconsin child pornography statute. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Burkegreen2 sentences2016See State v. Burke, 23 Conn.App. 528 , 529-32, 582 A.2d 915 (1990) (concluding that General Statutes [Rev. to 1987] § 29-305 was constitutional as applied to inspection for fire code violations conducted by local fire marshal pursuant to administrative search warrant), cert. denied, 218 Conn. 906 , 588 A.2d 1383 (1991) ; see also Rutka v. Meriden, 145 Conn.App. 202 , 211 n. 9, 75 A.3d 722 (2013). 2016See State v. Burke, 23 Conn.App. 528 , 529-32, 582 A.2d 915 (1990) (concluding that General Statutes [Rev. to 1987] § 29-305 was constitutional as applied to inspection for fire code violations conducted by local fire marshal pursuant to administrative search warrant), cert. denied, 218 Conn. 906 , 588 A.2d 1383 (1991) ; see also Rutka v. Meriden, 145 Conn.App. 202 , 211 n. 9, 75 A.3d 722 (2013). | 1 | 1 |
Rutka v. City of Meridengreen2 sentences2016See State v. Burke, 23 Conn.App. 528 , 529-32, 582 A.2d 915 (1990) (concluding that General Statutes [Rev. to 1987] § 29-305 was constitutional as applied to inspection for fire code violations conducted by local fire marshal pursuant to administrative search warrant), cert. denied, 218 Conn. 906 , 588 A.2d 1383 (1991) ; see also Rutka v. Meriden, 145 Conn.App. 202 , 211 n. 9, 75 A.3d 722 (2013). 2016See State v. Burke, 23 Conn.App. 528 , 529-32, 582 A.2d 915 (1990) (concluding that General Statutes [Rev. to 1987] § 29-305 was constitutional as applied to inspection for fire code violations conducted by local fire marshal pursuant to administrative search warrant), cert. denied, 218 Conn. 906 , 588 A.2d 1383 (1991) ; see also Rutka v. Meriden, 145 Conn.App. 202 , 211 n. 9, 75 A.3d 722 (2013). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Tanzellagreen2 sentences2016See State v. Burke, 23 Conn.App. 528 , 529-32, 582 A.2d 915 (1990) (concluding that General Statutes [Rev. to 1987] § 29-305 was constitutional as applied to inspection for fire code violations conducted by local fire marshal pursuant to administrative search warrant), cert. denied, 218 Conn. 906 , 588 A.2d 1383 (1991) ; see also Rutka v. Meriden, 145 Conn.App. 202 , 211 n. 9, 75 A.3d 722 (2013). 2016See State v. Burke, 23 Conn.App. 528 , 529-32, 582 A.2d 915 (1990) (concluding that General Statutes [Rev. to 1987] § 29-305 was constitutional as applied to inspection for fire code violations conducted by local fire marshal pursuant to administrative search warrant), cert. denied, 218 Conn. 906 , 588 A.2d 1383 (1991) ; see also Rutka v. Meriden, 145 Conn.App. 202 , 211 n. 9, 75 A.3d 722 (2013). | 1 | 1 |
Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.green2 sentences1983Any disobedience of any final order entered under this section by any court shall be punished as a contempt thereof." [3] See footnote 1, supra, for full text of General Statutes § 42-110d (c). [4] CUTPA also contains provisions, not directly addressed in the present appeal, creating a private cause of action for "[a]ny person who suffers any ascertainable loss of money or property, real or personal, as a result of the use or employment of a method, act or practice prohibited by section 42-110b...." General Statutes § 42-110g (a); see Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corporation, 184 Conn. 607 , 1983Any disobedience of any final order entered under this section by any court shall be punished as a contempt thereof." [3] See footnote 1, supra, for full text of General Statutes § 42-110d (c). [4] CUTPA also contains provisions, not directly addressed in the present appeal, creating a private cause of action for "[a]ny person who suffers any ascertainable loss of money or property, real or personal, as a result of the use or employment of a method, act or practice prohibited by section 42-110b...." General Statutes § 42-110g (a); see Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corporation, 184 Conn. 607 , | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Arnone v. Town of Enfield
green
2 sentences2025Connecticut’s whistleblower statute, § 31-51m, protects an ‘‘employee from retaliatory discharge when the employee has complained, in good faith, about a suspected violation of a state or federal law or regulation.’’ (Footnote omitted.) Arnone v. Enfield, 79 Conn. App. 501 , 506– 507, 831 A.2d 260 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 932 , 837 A.2d 804 (2003). 2025Connecticut’s whistleblower statute, § 31-51m, protects an ‘‘employee from retaliatory discharge when the employee has complained, in good faith, about a suspected violation of a state or federal law or regulation.’’ (Footnote omitted.) Arnone v. Enfield, 79 Conn. App. 501 , 506– 507, 831 A.2d 260 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 932 , 837 A.2d 804 (2003). | 2 | 2017–2025 |
Arnone v. Town of Enfield
green
2 sentences2025Connecticut’s whistleblower statute, § 31-51m, protects an ‘‘employee from retaliatory discharge when the employee has complained, in good faith, about a suspected violation of a state or federal law or regulation.’’ (Footnote omitted.) Arnone v. Enfield, 79 Conn. App. 501 , 506– 507, 831 A.2d 260 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 932 , 837 A.2d 804 (2003). 2025Connecticut’s whistleblower statute, § 31-51m, protects an ‘‘employee from retaliatory discharge when the employee has complained, in good faith, about a suspected violation of a state or federal law or regulation.’’ (Footnote omitted.) Arnone v. Enfield, 79 Conn. App. 501 , 506– 507, 831 A.2d 260 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 932 , 837 A.2d 804 (2003). | 2 | 2017–2025 |
Terry v. Ohio
green
2 sentences2010I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the Appellate Court properly determined that the state failed to demonstrate that State Trooper David Mattioli possessed a reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop the defendant, Gregory Cyrus, for a suspected violation of General Statutes § 14-99f (c) 1 pursuant to Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S. Ct. 1868 , 20 L. 2010I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the Appellate Court properly determined that the state failed to demonstrate that State Trooper David Mattioli possessed a reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop the defendant, Gregory Cyrus, for a suspected violation of General Statutes § 14-99f (c) 1 pursuant to Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S. Ct. 1868 , 20 L. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
green
2 sentences2003Such whistle-blowing claims for retaliatory discharge typically invite analysis under the framework first established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802-804 , 93 S. Ct. 1817 , 36 L. 2003Such whistle-blowing claims for retaliatory discharge typically invite analysis under the framework first established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802-804 , 93 S. Ct. 1817 , 36 L. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.