Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2011–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Heien v. North Carolinagreen2 sentences2018Heien v. North Carolina, 135 S. Ct. 530, 536 (2014); State v. Torrez, 490 S.W.3d 279, 283 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2016, pet. ref’d); see Tex. Const. art. 2016Heien v. North Carolina, 135 S.Ct. 530, 536 (2014). 3 within a minute after the stop, the trooper told Robinson that he intended to give her a warning for speeding. | 2 | 4 |
Armitage v. Stategreen2 sentences2014See Armitage, 637 S.W.2d at 939 . 2011See Armitage v. State, 637 S.W.2d 936, 939 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Riley v. Walgreen Co.green1 sentence2025See Riley v. Walgreen Co., 233 F.R.D. 496, 501 (S.D. | 1 | 1 |
Whren v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2020See Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 809-810 (1996). | 1 | 1 |
Wong Sun v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2020According to Collier, because the trooper violated his rights under the Fourth Amendment in one of these three ways, the evidence the trooper discovered is “fruit of the poisonous tree” 12 and is evidence the trial court should have suppressed. 9 Id. 10 Id. 11 Id. 12 See Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 485-86 (1963). 6 The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects persons against unreasonable searches and seizures. 13 An arrest is “the quintessential seizure” of a person under the Fourth Amendment. 14 “A traffic stop for a suspected violation of law is a ‘seizure’ of | 1 | 1 |
State v. Connie Torrezgreen1 sentence2018Heien v. North Carolina, 135 S. Ct. 530, 536 (2014); State v. Torrez, 490 S.W.3d 279, 283 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2016, pet. ref’d); see Tex. Const. art. | 1 | 1 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2017See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ; Tapia v. State, 462 S.W.3d 29, 44 (Tex. Crim. 2017See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ; Tapia v. State, 462 S.W.3d 29, 44 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Tapia, Gilbert Jr.green1 sentence2017See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ; Tapia v. State, 462 S.W.3d 29, 44 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Howard v. Stategreen1 sentence2014Howard v. State, 932 S.W.2d 216, 218-19 (Tex. App.— Texarkana 1996, pet. ref’d). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lerma v. State
green
2 sentences2020According to Collier, because the trooper violated his rights under the Fourth Amendment in one of these three ways, the evidence the trooper discovered is “fruit of the poisonous tree” 12 and is evidence the trial court should have suppressed. 9 Id. 10 Id. 11 Id. 12 See Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 485-86 (1963). 6 The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects persons against unreasonable searches and seizures. 13 An arrest is “the quintessential seizure” of a person under the Fourth Amendment. 14 “A traffic stop for a suspected violation of law is a ‘seizure’ of 2020According to Collier, because the trooper violated his rights under the Fourth Amendment in one of these three ways, the evidence the trooper discovered is “fruit of the poisonous tree” 12 and is evidence the trial court should have suppressed. 9 Id. 10 Id. 11 Id. 12 See Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 485-86 (1963). 6 The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects persons against unreasonable searches and seizures. 13 An arrest is “the quintessential seizure” of a person under the Fourth Amendment. 14 “A traffic stop for a suspected violation of law is a ‘seizure’ of | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Brendlin v. California
green
1 sentence2019Heien v. North Carolina, 574 U.S. 54 , 60 (2014), citing Brendlin v. California, 551 U.S. 249 , 255–259 2 Article 38.23(a) of the Code provides that: “No evidence obtained by an officer or other person in violation of any provisions of the Constitution or laws of the State of Texas, or of the Constitution or laws of the United States of America, shall be admitted in evidence against the accused on the trial of any criminal case. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.