Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Johnson v. Board of Ed. of Chicago.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Johnson v. Board of Ed. of Chicago Anchor | green | “because we have vacated the court of appeals' judgments in this case, the doctrine of the law of the case does not constrain either the district court or, should an appeal subsequently be taken, the court of appeals.” | 8 |
| 2 | John Languirand, Cross-Appellant v. John Hayden, an Individual, City of Pass Christian, Etc., Cross-Appellee | green | “isolated violations are not the persistent, often repeated constant violations that constitute custom and policy” | 4 |
| 3 | Brown v. Bryan County, OK | green | “for consideration in conformity with the opinion of the supreme court.” | 3 |
| 4 | Hill Stokes v. Willie Bullins | green | “the unconstitutional municipal policy” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.