Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 72 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Universal Coach, Inc. v. New York City Transit Authority, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Universal Coach, Inc. v. New York City Transit Authority, Inc. Anchor | green | “(1) a malicious combination; (2) two or more persons; (3) injury to person or property; and (4) existence of an unlawful act independent from the actual conspiracy.” | 23 |
| 2 | Gosden v. Louis | green | “does not require a showing of an express agreement between defendants, but only a common understanding or design, even if tacit, to commit an unlawful act.” | 20 |
| 3 | Lauren M. Pavlovich v. National City Bank | green | “it is unclear whether ohio recognizes a common law cause of action for aiding and abetting tortious conduct.” | 11 |
| 4 | Andonian v. A.C. & S., Inc. | green | “substantial assistance or encouragement to the primary party in carrying out the tortious act.” | 11 |
| 5 | Minarik v. Nagy | green | “the general rule is that a conspiracy cannot be made the subject of a civil action unless something is done which, without the conspiracy, would give a right of action.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.