10 C.F.R. § 50.23
Construction permits
A construction permit for the construction of a production or utilization facility will be issued before the issuance of a license if the application is otherwise acceptable, and will be converted upon completion of the facility and Commission action, into a license as provided in § 50.56. However, if a combined license for a nuclear power reactor is issued under part 52 of this chapter, the construction permit and operating license are deemed to be combined in a single license. A construction permit for the alteration of a production or utilization facility will be issued before the issuance of an amendment of a license, if the application for amendment is otherwise acceptable, as provided in § 50.92.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1969–1979 · leading case: Madison Gas & Elec. Co. v. Comm'r, 72 T.C. 521 (Tax Ct. 1979).
Madison Gas & Elec. Co. v. Comm'r, 72 T.C. 521 (Tax Ct. 1979). “In order to obtain a plant operating license, petitioner, WPS, and WPL had to demonstrate to the NRC that the facility was essentially constructed as described in the final safety analysis report.”
Cities of Statesville v. Atomic Energy Comm'n & United States of Am., Duke Power Co., Intervenor. Power Plan. Comm. of the Mun. Elec. Ass'n of Massachusetts v. Atomic Energy Comm'n & United States of Am., Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp., Intervenor, 441 F.2d 962 (D.C. Cir. 1969). “906ff 8 10 C.F.R. 50.23, 50.24, 50.56 (1969 ed.) 9 In this connection, AEC Commisioner Ramey testified at Joint Committee hearings on April 30, 1968, that the Commission would 'come to grips' with the practical value question probably within the next two years.”
Cities of Statesville v. Atomic Energy Comm'n, 441 F.2d 962 (D.C. Cir. 1969). “10 C.F.R. §§ 50.23 , 50.24, 50.56 (1969 ed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.