10 C.F.R. § 860.6

Posting

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Notices stating the pertinent prohibitions of §§ 860.3 and 860.4 and penalties of § 860.5 will be conspicuously posted at all entrances of each designated facility, installation or parcel of real property and at such intervals along the perimeter as will provide reasonable assurance of notice to persons about to enter.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1979–1982 · leading case: United States v. Best, 476 F. Supp. 34 (D. Colo. 1979).
United States v. Best, 476 F. Supp. 34 (D. Colo. 1979). “[See, Exhibit 14] At the evidentiary hearing on the motions photographs were introduced showing that large, easily readable signs had been posted which clearly complied with the requirements of 10 C.F.R. § 860.6 and which gave every defendant personal notice that crossing the…”
United States v. Thompson, 687 F.2d 1279 (10th Cir. 1982). “The testimony taken at the motions hearing shows that the trespassing prohibition was posted clearly and conspicuously, in conformity with 10 C.F.R. § 860.6 , at intervals along the boundary of the area restricted by the April 13 notice.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.