C.F.R. » Title 12 » CHAPTER I—COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY › PART 21—MINIMUM SECURITY DEVICES AND PROCEDURES, REPORTS OF SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES, AND BANK SECRECY ACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAM › Subpart A—Minimum Security Devices and Procedures

12 C.F.R. § 21.4

Report

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The security officer for a national bank shall report at least annually to the bank's board of directors on the effectiveness of the security program. The substance of such report shall be reflected in the minutes of the Board meeting in which it is given.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1557-0180)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1991–1991 · leading case: Page v. Am. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 850 S.W.2d 133 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Page v. Am. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 850 S.W.2d 133 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “The alleged regulations, violated are, specifically: 12 CFR 21.4(b)(1) — requiring a bank to establish a schedule for the inspection, testing and servicing of all security devices installed in each banking office and to designate a security officer with those duties and to keep…”
— 12 C.F.R. § 21.4(b)(1) — 1 case
Page v. Am. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 850 S.W.2d 133 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991). “The alleged regulations, violated are, specifically: 12 CFR 21.4(b)(1) — requiring a bank to establish a schedule for the inspection, testing and servicing of all security devices installed in each banking office and to designate a security officer with those duties and to keep…”
— 12 C.F.R. § 21.4(b)(7) — 1 case
Page v. Am. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 850 S.W.2d 133 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991). “The alleged regulations, violated are, specifically: 12 CFR 21.4(b)(1) — requiring a bank to establish a schedule for the inspection, testing and servicing of all security devices installed in each banking office and to designate a security officer with those duties and to keep…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.