12 C.F.R. § 261.20

General

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) All confidential supervisory information and other nonpublic information, including but not limited to information made available under this subpart, remains the property of the Board, and except as otherwise provided in this regulation, no person, entity, agency, or authority to whom the information is made available or who otherwise possesses the information, including any officer, director, employee, or agent thereof, may use any such information for an unauthorized purpose or disclose any such information without the prior written permission of the General Counsel.

(b) The disclosure of confidential supervisory information or other nonpublic information in accordance with this subpart shall not constitute a waiver by the Board of any applicable privileges.

(c) Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to limit or restrict the authority of the Board to impose any additional conditions or limitations on the use and disclosure of confidential supervisory information or other nonpublic information. Further, nothing in this subpart shall be construed to limit or restrict the authority of the Board to make discretionary disclosures of confidential supervisory information or other nonpublic information in addition to the disclosures expressly provided for in this subpart.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2019–2022 · leading case: Se. Pa. Transp. Auth. v. Orrstown Fin. Servs., Inc., 367 F. Supp. 3d 267 (M.D. Penn. 2019).
Se. Pa. Transp. Auth. v. Orrstown Fin. Servs., Inc., 367 F. Supp. 3d 267 (M.D. Penn. 2019). · cites it 2× “; see also 12 C.F.R. §§ 261.20 (g), 261.22(e), 261.23(b).”
Kashef v. BNP Paribas SA (S.D.N.Y. 2022). “; 12 C.F.R. § 261.20 et seq. On July 12, 2022, a hearing was held regarding this question, as well as several other outstanding issues.”
Se. Pennsylvania Transp. Auth. v. Orrstown Fin. Servs., Inc. (M.D. Penn. 2022). “; see also 12 C.F.R. §§ 261.20 (g), 261.22(e), 261.23(b).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.