12 C.F.R. § 5.2
Rules of general applicability
(a) In general. The rules in this subpart apply to all sections in this part unless otherwise stated.
(b) Exceptions. The OCC may adopt materially different procedures for a particular filing, or class of filings as it deems necessary, for example, in exceptional circumstances or for unusual transactions, after providing notice of the change to the filer and to any other party that the OCC determines should receive notice.
(c) Comptroller's Licensing Manual. The “Comptroller's Licensing Manual” provides additional filing guidance, including policies and procedures. This Manual and sample forms are available at www.occ.gov.
(d) Electronic filing. The OCC encourages electronic filing for all filings. The Comptroller's Licensing Manual describes the OCC's electronic filing procedures.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1974–1981 · leading case: The First Bank & Trust Co. v. James E. Smith, Comptroller, Etc., 509 F.2d 663 (1st Cir. 1975).
The First Bank & Trust Co. v. James E. Smith, Comptroller, Etc., 509 F.2d 663 (1st Cir. 1975). “Pursuant to 12 C.F.R. § 5.2 (b) Middlesex Bank published legal notice of its application, and First Bank requested that a hearing on the application be held in accordance with 12 C.”
First Nat'l Bank v. Aberdeen Nat'l Bank, 471 F. Supp. 460 (D.S.D. 1979). “Sometime during the week of January 29, 1978, the Regional Administrator of National Banks notified the plaintiff of defendant’s name change pursuant to 12 C.F.R. Section 5.2(c). The notification took place by mailing the plaintiff a copy of the Regional Administrator’s weekly…”
Seattle Trust & Sav. Bank, a Bank Inc. Under the Laws of the State of Washington v. The Bank of California, N.A., a Nat'l Banking Ass'n, & William B. Camp, Comptroller of the Currency of the United States,intervening John J. McCarthy Supervisor, Div. of Banking, Dep't of Generaladministration, State of Washington, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. The Bank of California, N.A., a Nat'l Banking Ass'n, & William B. Camp, Comptroller of the Currency of the United States,intervening, 492 F.2d 48 (9th Cir. 1974). “Indeed, had the Comptroller followed the appellants' reasoning in the instant case, the Supervisor of Banking for the State of Washington would not have been notified by the Comptroller of the Bank of California's relocation and new branch applications since the Comptroller's…”
Seattle Trust & Sav. Bank v. Bank of California, N.A., 492 F.2d 48 (9th Cir. 1974). “Indeed, had the Comptroller followed the appellants’ reasoning in the instant case, the Supervisor of Banking for the State of Washington would not have been notified by the Comptroller of the Bank of California’s relocation and new branch applications since the Comptroller’s…”
Pioneer First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Pioneer Nat'l Bank, 637 P.2d 661 (Wash. Ct. App. 1981). “) 12 C.F.R. § 5.2 (1976). Section 5.4 of 12 C.”
— 12 C.F.R. § 5.2(c) — 2 cases
First Nat'l Bank v. Aberdeen Nat'l Bank, 471 F. Supp. 460 (D.S.D. 1979). “Sometime during the week of January 29, 1978, the Regional Administrator of National Banks notified the plaintiff of defendant’s name change pursuant to 12 C.F.R. Section 5.2(c). The notification took place by mailing the plaintiff a copy of the Regional Administrator’s weekly…”
Seattle Trust & Sav. Bank, a Bank Inc. Under the Laws of the State of Washington v. The Bank of California, N.A., a Nat'l Banking Ass'n, & William B. Camp, Comptroller of the Currency of the United States,intervening John J. McCarthy Supervisor, Div. of Banking, Dep't of Generaladministration, State of Washington, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. The Bank of California, N.A., a Nat'l Banking Ass'n, & William B. Camp, Comptroller of the Currency of the United States,intervening, 492 F.2d 48 (9th Cir. 1974). “Indeed, had the Comptroller followed the appellants' reasoning in the instant case, the Supervisor of Banking for the State of Washington would not have been notified by the Comptroller of the Bank of California's relocation and new branch applications since the Comptroller's…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.