(a) The fuel system of the engine must be designed and constructed to supply an appropriate mixture of fuel to the cylinders throughout the complete operating range of the engine under all flight and atmospheric conditions.
(b) The intake passages of the engine through which air or fuel in combination with air passes for combustion purposes must be designed and constructed to minimize the danger of ice accretion in those passages. The engine must be designed and constructed to permit the use of a means for ice prevention.
(c) The type and degree of fuel filtering necessary for protection of the engine fuel system against foreign particles in the fuel must be specified. The applicant must show that foreign particles passing through the prescribed filtering means will not critically impair engine fuel system functioning.
(d) Each passage in the induction system that conducts a mixture of fuel and air must be self-draining, to prevent a liquid lock in the cylinders, in all attitudes that the applicant establishes as those the engine can have when the aircraft in which it is installed is in the static ground attitude.
(e) If provided as part of the engine, the applicant must show for each fluid injection (other than fuel) system and its controls that the flow of the injected fluid is adequately controlled.
[Doc. No. 3025, 29 FR 7453, June 10, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 33-10, 49 FR 6851, Feb. 23, 1984]
Notes of Decisions
Sikkelee Ex Rel. Est. of Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive Corp., 822 F.3d 680 (3rd Cir. 2016).
“” 14 C.F.R. § 33.35 (a) (emphasis added). As the District Court observed, the highly technical and part-specific nature of these regulations makes them exceedingly difficult to translate into a standard of care that could be applied to a tort claim.”
Hetzer-Young v. Precision Airmotive Corp., 921 N.E.2d 683 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009).
“” 14 C.F.R. 33.35(a). Lycoming conceded that “[f]or maintaining the flow limits on a particular carburetor as it is installed in the engine, that is our responsibility.”
Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive, Corp., 876 F. Supp. 2d 479 (M.D. Penn. 2012).
“104 — by designing and constructing a fuel supply system which did not ensure an appropriate mixture of fuel to the cylinders under all flight and atmospheric conditions in violation of 14 C.F.R. § 33.35 and CAR § 13.110 — by issuing continued airworthiness instructions which…”
Est. Of Virgil Victor Becker, Jr., App. v. Forward Tech. Indus., Inc., Res., 365 P.3d 1273 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015).
“These regulations include: • 14 C.F.R. § 33.35 (a) (“The fuel system of the engine must be designed and constructed to supply an appropriate mixture of fuel to the cylinders throughout *77 the complete operating range of the engine under all flight and atmospheric conditions.”
Sikkelee v. AVCO Corp., 268 F. Supp. 3d 660 (M.D. Penn. 2017).
“Fueling mechanism are regulated in part by 14 C.F.R. § 33.35 (a), which requires that a reciprocating or piston engine’s fuel injection system “be designed .”
— 14 C.F.R. § 33.35(a) — 1 case
Hetzer-Young v. Precision Airmotive Corp., 921 N.E.2d 683 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009).
“” 14 C.F.R. 33.35(a). Lycoming conceded that “[f]or maintaining the flow limits on a particular carburetor as it is installed in the engine, that is our responsibility.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.