C.F.R. » Title 18 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY › SUBCHAPTER B—REGULATIONS UNDER THE FEDERAL POWER ACT › PART 4—LICENSES, PERMITS, EXEMPTIONS, AND DETERMINATION OF PROJECT COSTS › Subpart L—Application for Amendment of License

18 C.F.R. § 4.200

Applicability

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part applies to any application for amendment of a license, if the applicant seeks to:

(a) Make a change in the physical features of the project or its boundary, or make an addition, betterment, abandonment, or conversion, of such character as to constitute an alteration of the license;

(b) Make a change in the plans for the project under license; or

(c) Extend the time fixed in the license for commencement or completion of project works.

[Order 184, 46 FR 55943, Nov. 13, 1981, as amended by Order 2002, 68 FR 51121, Aug. 25, 2003]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1992–2022 · leading case: State of North Carolina Roanoke River Basin Ass'n v. City of Virginia Beach, 951 F.2d 596 (4th Cir. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State of North Carolina Roanoke River Basin Ass'n v. City of Virginia Beach, 951 F.2d 596 (4th Cir. 1992). “§ 803 (a)(1) and 18 C.F.R. § 4.200 . In contrast, Virginia Beach has argued that FERC need only approve the conveyance of easements from VEPCO to Virginia Beach.”
United States ex rel. Kalispel Indian Tribe v. Pend Oreille Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1, 28 F.3d 1544 (9th Cir. 1994). “§ 803 (b) (requires FERC approval for alterations to project); 18 C.F.R. § 4.200 (provides procedures for amending license).”
Cnty. of Butte v. Dept. of Water Resources (Cal. 2022). “713 (2022) [authorizing request for rehearing]; 18 C.F.R. § 4.200 (b) (2022) [allowing application to amend license after issuance]; 16 U.”
Cnty. of Butte v. Dept. of Water Resources (Cal. 2022). “713 (2022) [authorizing request for rehearing]; 18 C.F.R. § 4.200 (b) (2022) [allowing application to amend license after issuance]; 16 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.