19 C.F.R. § 103.0

Scope

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part governs the production/disclosure of agency-maintained documents/information requested pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), as amended (5 U.S.C. 552), the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552a), and/or under other statutory or regulatory provisions and/or as requested through administrative and/or legal processes. In this respect, this part contains regulations on production or disclosure in federal, state, local, and foreign proceedings and includes specific information pertaining to the procedures to be followed when producing or disclosing documents or information under various circumstances. In addition, this part contains regulations on other information subject to restricted access. As information obtained by CBP is derived from myriad sources, persons seeking information should consult with the appropriate field officer before invoking the formal procedures set forth in this part. The regulations in this part supplement the regulations of the Department of Homeland Security regarding public access to records found at 6 CFR part 5. For purposes of this part, the CBP Office of the Chief Counsel is considered to be a part of CBP.

[CBP Dec. 15-16, 80 FR 71692, Nov. 17, 2015, as amended by CBP Dec. 20-09, 85 FR 31057, May 22, 2020]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1974–1989 · leading case: Superior Wire v. The United States, William Von Raab, Comm'r of Customs, & Dist. Dir. of Customs at Port of Detroit, Michigan, 867 F.2d 1409 (Fed. Cir. 1989).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Superior Wire v. The United States, William Von Raab, Comm'r of Customs, & Dist. Dir. of Customs at Port of Detroit, Michigan, 867 F.2d 1409 (Fed. Cir. 1989). “The ruling was available on microfiche in accordance with Customs regulations, see 19 C.F.R. § 103.0 (1988), et seq., and the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.”

Neal-Cooper Grain Co. v. Kissinger, 385 F. Supp. 769 (D.D.C. 1974). “19 C.F.R. § 103.0 . This is in accord with the general view that the exemptions listed in the FOIA authorize nondisclosure but do not require it.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.