C.F.R. » Title 19 » CHAPTER II—UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION › SUBCHAPTER B—NONADJUDICATIVE INVESTIGATIONS › PART 207—INVESTIGATIONS OF WHETHER INJURY TO DOMESTIC INDUSTRIES RESULTS FROM IMPORTS SOLD AT LESS THAN FAIR VALUE OR FROM SUBSIDIZED EXPORTS TO THE UNITED STATES › Subpart C—Final Determinations, Short Life Cycle Products

19 C.F.R. § 207.26

Statements by nonparties

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person other than a party may submit a brief written statement of information pertinent to the investigation within the time specified for the filing of posthearing briefs.

[56 FR 11928, Mar. 21, 1991. Redesignated at 61 FR 37832, July 22, 1996]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1984–1988 · leading case: Rhone Poulenc, S.A. v. United States, 592 F. Supp. 1318 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rhone Poulenc, S.A. v. United States, 592 F. Supp. 1318 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1984). · cites it 4× “§ 1677 (7)(B)(i) — (iii) (1982); see 19 C.F.R. § 207.26 (a)(l)-(3) (1983). *1323 Although economic factors indicating a threat of material injury vary from case to case, the factors required to be considered in a final determination of present injury must be reviewed in the…”
Nat'l Ass'n of Mirror Mfrs. v. United States, 696 F. Supp. 642 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1988). · cites it 2× “§ 1677 (7)(B)(iii) (1982); 19 C.F.R. § 207.26 (a)(3) (1988). In examining the impact of less than fair value imports on a domestic industry, the Commission shall evaluate all relevant economic factors which have a bearing on the state of the industry, including, but not limited…”
British Steel Corp. v. United States, 593 F. Supp. 405 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1984). “§ 1677 (7)(B)(i)-(iii) (1982); see 19 C.F.R. § 207.26 (a)(l)-(3) (1983). III.”
Maverick Tube Corp. v. United States, 687 F. Supp. 1569 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1988). “§ 1677 (7)(C)(ii)(I) (1982); 19 C.F.R. § 207.26 (b)(2)(i-ii) (1987). Commissioners Lodwick and Rohr found “no significant underselling or pattern of price leadership” by Canadian imports.”
Keyes Fibre Co. v. United States, 12 Ct. Int'l Trade 223 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1988). “Compare 19 C.F.R. § 207.26 with id., § 207.27. Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief, p.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.