20 C.F.R. § 404.965
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2022 · leading case: Salling v. Bowen, 641 F. Supp. 1046 (W.D. Va. 1986).
Salling v. Bowen, 641 F. Supp. 1046 (W.D. Va. 1986). “Court Exhibit 2 reflects that the new project got underway on April 1, 1986 and the restructuring was undertaken in accordance with the existing regulations at 20 C.F.R. 404.965 and 416.1465 which provide the project’s purposes and indicate that the project purposes will remain…”
Harris v. Callahan, 11 F. Supp. 2d 880 (E.D. Tex. 1998). “See 20 C.F.R. § 404.965 . The Appeals Council is to review a case where, inter alia, there is an abuse of discretion by the ALJ, or if the ALJ’s decision is not supported by the substantial evidence.”
Lewis-Johnson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (N.D. Ohio 2022). “The claimant is unable to perform any past relevant work (20 CFR 404.965). 6. The claimant was born on ***, 1974 and was 42 years old, which is defined as a younger individual age 18-49, on the date the application was filed (20 CFR 416.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.