20 C.F.R. § 725.217

Determination of dependency; surviving divorced spouse

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

An individual who is the miner's surviving divorced spouse (see § 725.216) shall be determined to have been dependent on the miner if, for the month before the month in which the miner died:

(a) The individual was receiving at least one-half of his or her support from the miner (see § 725.233(g)); or

(b) The individual was receiving substantial contributions from the miner pursuant to a written agreement (see § 725.233(c) and (f)); or

(c) A court order required the miner to furnish substantial contributions to the individual's support (see § 725.233(c) and (e)).

Notes of Decisions
Mary Lombardy (Surviving Divorced Spouse of Frank Lombardy) v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 355 F.3d 211 (3rd Cir. 2004). · cites it 4× “See 20 C.F.R. § 725.217 . Mrs. Lombardy appealed and requested a hearing.”
Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor v. Aleen E. Ball, 826 F.2d 603 (7th Cir. 1987). “To recover benefits under the Black Lung Benefits Act, a surviving divorced wife must show that she was financially “dependent on the miner,” 20 C.F.R. § 725.217 (a) (1986), by demonstrating that she falls within one of three categories: (1) a widow who “was receiving at least…”
Charles v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, 1 F.3d 251 (4th Cir. 1993). “shall be determined to have been dependent on the miner if, for the month before the month in which the miner died: (3) A court order required the miner to furnish substantial contributions to the individual's support.”
May W. Tucker v. Dir., OWCP, 155 F. App'x 413 (11th Cir. 2005). · cites it 6× “20 C.F.R. § 725.217 . “One-half of her support” is defined as support that “equaled or exceeded one-half the total cost of such individual’s support at such time or during such period.”
Lombardy v. Dir. OWCP (3rd Cir. 2004). · cites it 4× “See 20 C.F.R. § 725.217 . Mrs. Lombardy appealed and requested a hearing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.