C.F.R. » Title 24 » CHAPTER V—OFFICE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT › SUBCHAPTER C—COMMUNITY FACILITIES › PART 570—COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS › Subpart G—Urban Development Action Grants

24 C.F.R. § 570.461

Post-preliminary approval requirements; lead-based paint

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The recipient may receive preliminary approval prior to the accomplishment of lead-based paint activities conducted pursuant to part 35, subparts A, B, J, K, and R of this title, but no funds will be released until such actions are complete and evidence of compliance is submitted to HUD.

[64 FR 50225, Sept. 15, 1999]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1981–1998 · leading case: The City of Kansas City, Missouri v. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 923 F.2d 188 (D.C. Cir. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
The City of Kansas City, Missouri v. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 923 F.2d 188 (D.C. Cir. 1991). · cites it 3× “See 24 C.F.R. § 570.461 (a) (1990). Included in each UDAG agreement is a schedule for submission by the grant recipient of certain evidentiary materials, including evidence of “legally binding commitments” from all parties participating in the project.”
Pleune v. Pierce, 697 F. Supp. 113 (E.D.N.Y 1988). · cites it 2× “HUD will release the funds after the grant agreement is executed, the legally binding commitments required by 24 C.F.R. § 570.461 (b) are provided and approved, and the City notifies HUD that it has satisfied the requirements under 24 C.”
City of Boston v. United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 898 F.2d 828 (1st Cir. 1990). “24 C.F.R. § 570.461 (b). Boston was also required to incur the costs reimbursable by the UDAG funds before the grant funds were actually released.”
Soc'y Hill Towers Owners' Ass'n v. Rendell, 20 F. Supp. 2d 855 (E.D. Pa. 1998). · cites it 2× “24 C.F.R § 570.461 (before Apr. 19, 1996); 20 C.”
Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc. v. City of New York, 528 F. Supp. 1245 (S.D.N.Y. 1981). · cites it 2× “§ 5304 (h)(2); 24 C.F.R. § 570.461 (1981). Defendant Portman risks forfeiture of reimbursement if the Urban Development Action Grant [“UDAG”] is not later approved, but does not risk any violation of the HCDA.”
Soc'y Hill Towers Owners'ass'n v. Rendell, 20 F. Supp. 2d 855 (E.D. Pa. 1998). · cites it 2× “24 C.F.R § 570.461 (before Apr. 19, 1996); 20 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.