C.F.R. » Title 24 » PART 58—ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR ENTITIES ASSUMING HUD ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES › Subpart D—Environmental Review Process: Documentation, Range of Activities, Project Aggregation and Classification

24 C.F.R. § 58.36

Environmental assessments

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

If a project is not exempt or categorically excluded under §§ 58.34 and 58.35, the responsible entity must prepare an EA in accordance with subpart E of this part. If it is evident without preparing an EA that an EIS is required under § 58.37, the responsible entity should proceed directly to an EIS.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1990–2002 · leading case: Ka Makani 'O Kohala Ohana Inc. v. Water Supply, 295 F.3d 955 (9th Cir. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ka Makani 'O Kohala Ohana Inc. v. Water Supply, 295 F.3d 955 (9th Cir. 2002). “See 24 C.F.R. § 58.36 . Projects “consisting solely” of exempted activities, which include “environmental and other studies, resource identification and the development of plans and strategies,” see 24 C.”
Cornell Vill. Tower Condo. v. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 750 F. Supp. 909 (N.D. Ill. 1990). “See 24 C.F.R. § 58.36 , 58.41 (1989). If a recipient determines that the project will not significantly affect the environment, no environmental impact statement (“EIS”) is required.”
Soc'y Hill Towers Owners' Ass'n v. Rendell, 20 F. Supp. 2d 855 (E.D. Pa. 1998). · cites it 2× “Unless a project is considered an exempt or a categorically excluded activity, 24 C.F.R. § 58.36 , the grant recipient must prepare an environmental assessment (“EA”), 19 24 C.”
Castenson v. City of Harcourt, 86 F. Supp. 2d 866 (N.D. Iowa 2000). “” 24 C.F.R. § 58.36 (also providing that a party may proceed directly to preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) if it is “obvious” even without an EA that an EIS will be required).”
Soc'y Hill Towers Owners' Assn. v. Rendell, 210 F.3d 168 (3rd Cir. 2000). “24 C.F.R. § 58.36 . If the EA demonstrates that the project will not pose a significant environmental impact, HUD requires that a FON-SI be published for public comment.”
Soc'y Hill Towers Owners'ass'n v. Rendell, 20 F. Supp. 2d 855 (E.D. Pa. 1998). · cites it 2× “Unless a project is considered an exempt or a categorically excluded activity, 24 C.F.R. § 58.36 , the grant recipient must prepare an environmental assessment ("EA"), [19] 24 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.