25 C.F.R. § 23.101
What is the purpose of this subpart?
The regulations in this subpart clarify the minimum Federal standards governing implementation of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) to ensure that ICWA is applied in all States consistent with the Act's express language, Congress's intent in enacting the statute, and to promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 43
cases (27 in the last 5 years), 2017–2026 · leading case: Chad Brackeen v. David Bernhardt, 937 F.3d 406 (5th Cir. 2019).
Chad Brackeen v. David Bernhardt, 937 F.3d 406 (5th Cir. 2019). “” 25 C.F.R. § 23.101 ; Indian Child Welfare Act Proceedings, 81 Fed.”
In re D.E., 423 P.3d 586 (Mont. 2018). “101 : "The regulations in this subpart clarify the minimum Federal standards governing implementation of [ICWA] to ensure that ICWA is applied in all States consistent with the Act's express language, Congress's intent in enacting the statute, and to promote the stability and…”
Caitlyn E. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Off. of Child.'s Servs., 399 P.3d 646 (Alaska 2017). “See CIÑA Rule 1(f); 25 C.F.R. §§ 23.101 -.144 (2016); Guidelines for Implementing the Indian Child Welfare Act, 81 Fed.”
Brackeen v. Zinke, 338 F. Supp. 3d 514 (N.D. Tex. 2018). “" 25 C.F.R. § 23.101 . The regulations declared that while the BIA "initially hoped that binding regulations would not be necessary to carry out [the ICWA], a third of a century of experience has confirmed the need for more uniformity in the interpretation and application of…”
Oliver N. v. Dep't of Health, 444 P.3d 171 (Alaska 2019). “25 C.F.R. §§ 23.101 -.144 (2019) ; Guidelines for Implementing the Indian Child Welfare Act, 81 Fed.”
In re: L.W.S., 804 S.E.2d 816 (N.C. Ct. App. 2017). “See 25 C.F.R. §§ 23.101 et seq. (2017) ; Indian Child Welfare Act Proceedings , 81 Fed.”
In re A.L.D., 417 P.3d 342 (Mont. 2018). “See 25 C.F.R. § 23.101 (2018). The Regulations do not affect a proceeding under State law for foster-care placement, termination of parental rights, preadoptive placement, or adoptive placement that was initiated prior to December 12, 2016, but they do apply to any subsequent…”
In re P.F., 2017 UT App 159 (Utah Ct. App. 2017). “See 25 C.F.R. §§ 23.101 , 23.143 (2016). Because all relevant dates in this proceeding are prior to the effective date of the new regulations, we do not use them in our analysis.”
G.F. v. State, 405 P.3d 755 (Utah Ct. App. 2017). “See 25 C.F.R. §§ 23.101 , 23.143 (2016). Because all relevant dates in this proceeding are prior to the effective date of the new regulations, we do not use them in our analysis.”
In re L.D., 414 P.3d 768 (Mont. 2018). “, 25 CFR 23.101 (eff. Dec. 12, 2016): "The regulations in this subpart clarify the minimum Federal standards governing implementation of the [ICWA] to ensure that ICWA is applied in all States consistent with the Act's express language, Congress's intent in enacting the statute,…”
Chad Brackeen v. David Bernhardt (5th Cir. 2019). “” 25 C.F.R. § 23.101 ; Indian Child Welfare Act Proceedings, 81 Fed.”
In re M.W. (Cal. Ct. App. 2020).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.