C.F.R. » Title 29 » CHAPTER XVII—OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR › PART 1911—RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR PROMULGATING, MODIFYING, OR REVOKING OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY OR HEALTH STANDARDS

29 C.F.R. § 1911.5

Minor changes in standards

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 6(b), when construed in light of the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553), is read as permitting the making of minor rules or amendments in which the public is not particularly interested without the notice and public procedure which is otherwise required. Whenever such a minor rule or amendment is adopted, it shall incorporate a finding of good cause to this effect for not providing notice and public procedure.

[37 FR 8664, Apr. 29, 1972]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1973–1974 · leading case: Associated Indus. of New York State, Inc. v. The United States Dep't of Labor, 487 F.2d 342 (2d Cir. 1973).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Associated Indus. of New York State, Inc. v. The United States Dep't of Labor, 487 F.2d 342 (2d Cir. 1973). · cites it 3× “In 29 C.F.R. § 1911.5 (a)(2), as amended April 29, 1972, 37 F.”
Florida Peach Growers Ass'n v. United States Dep't of Labor, 489 F.2d 120 (5th Cir. 1974). “29 C.F.R. 1911.5(a)(2) (1973). Nothing in the statute itself, or in the legis-tive history, supports such a distinction.”
— 29 C.F.R. § 1911.5(a)(2) — 1 case
Florida Peach Growers Ass'n v. United States Dep't of Labor, 489 F.2d 120 (5th Cir. 1974). “29 C.F.R. 1911.5(a)(2) (1973). Nothing in the statute itself, or in the legis-tive history, supports such a distinction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.