C.F.R. » Title 30 » CHAPTER II—BUREAU OF SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR › SUBCHAPTER B—OFFSHORE › PART 250—OIL AND GAS AND SULPHUR OPERATIONS IN THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF › Subpart B—Plans and Information

30 C.F.R. § 250.233

General requirements for any I3P Report

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

An I3P Report as required in § 250.232 must be a standalone document that clearly summarizes the required verification and validation work performed and must contain a sufficient level of detail (e.g., quantitative information) and clarity to establish the basis of the I3P's findings. Each report must identify the OEM or operator documents reviewed, describe the detailed I3P review, and convey the results of the I3P's review without requiring BSEE to review of any other referenced documents.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2008–2008 · leading case: Alaska Wilderness League v. Kempthorne, 548 F.3d 815 (9th Cir. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Alaska Wilderness League v. Kempthorne, 548 F.3d 815 (9th Cir. 2008). · cites it 8× “30 C.F.R. § 250.233 . Shell's proposed drilling activities are the first to be considered for the Beaufort Sea in conjunction with these lease sales.”
Alaska Wilderness v. Kempthorne (9th Cir. 2008). · cites it 4× “30 C.F.R. § 250.233 . Shell’s proposed drilling activities are the first to be consid- ered for the Beaufort Sea in conjunction with these lease sales.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.