C.F.R. » Title 33 » CHAPTER I—COAST GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY › SUBCHAPTER P—PORTS AND WATERWAYS SAFETY › PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS › Subpart D—Security Zones

33 C.F.R. § 165.30

Security zones

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A security zone is an area of land, water, or land and water which is so designated by the Captain of the Port or District Commander for such time as is necessary to prevent damage or injury to any vessel or waterfront facility, to safeguard ports, harbors, territories, or waters of the United States or to secure the observance of the rights and obligations of the United States.

(b) The purpose of a security zone is to safeguard from destruction, loss, or injury from sabotage or other subversive acts, accidents, or other causes of a similar nature:

(1) Vessels,

(2) Harbors,

(3) Ports, and

(4) Waterfront facilities:

in the United States and all territory and water, continental or insular, that is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1991–2008 · leading case: Wong v. Bush, 542 F.3d 732 (9th Cir. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wong v. Bush, 542 F.3d 732 (9th Cir. 2008). · cites it 3× “They contend that by establishing a security zone to enable the HSF to dock at Nawiliwili Harbor, the United States Coast Guard violated their First Amendment right to free speech, the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), and 50 U.”
United States v. Ayala Ayala, 289 F.3d 16 (1st Cir. 2002). “A security zone is "an area of land, water, or land and water which is so designated by the Captain of the Port or District Commander for such time as is necessary to prevent damage or injury to any vessel or waterfront facility, to safeguard ports, harbors, territories, or…”
Richard Beveridge Peter Murray Gregory Davis Peter Eastman v. Steven H. Lewis City of Santa Barbara, 939 F.2d 859 (9th Cir. 1991). “” 33 C.F.R. § 165.30 (a). The difficulty with such a comparison is that safety or security *865 zones are officially established by the Coast Guard, 33 C.”
United States v. Jacqueline Allen, Arthur Laffin, James Patrick Reale, Elmer H. Maas, 924 F.2d 29 (2d Cir. 1991). “The purpose of a security zone is “to safeguard [vessels] from destruction, loss, or injury from sabotage or other subversive acts,” 33 C.F.R. § 165.30 , exactly the type of conduct appellants engaged in.”
United States v. Mulero-Joubert, 289 F.3d 168 (1st Cir. 2002). “” 33 C.F.R. § 165.30 (a). The regulations provide that “[n]o person or vessel may enter or remain in a security zone without permission of the Captain of the Port.”
Wong v. Bush (9th Cir. 2008). · cites it 3× “§ 191 and 33 C.F.R. § 165.30 , which govern the Coast Guard’s authority to create security zones safeguarding United States waters and harbors.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.