32 C.F.R. § 770.35
Purpose
The purpose of this subpart is to promulgate standard regulations and procedures governing entry upon U.S. Naval installations and properties in Puerto Rico.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 2000–2002 · leading case: United States v. Ayala Ayala, 289 F.3d 16 (1st Cir. 2002).
United States v. Ayala Ayala, 289 F.3d 16 (1st Cir. 2002). “n the District of Puerto Rico and within the jurisdiction of this Court, that is, on Camp Garcia Naval Installation at Vieques, Puerto Rico, that is, on lands reserved for the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, ARMANDO TORRES ORTIZ, defendant, did knowingly and…”
United States v. Sharpton, 252 F.3d 536 (1st Cir. 2001). “The government contends that Bonilla has been abrogated by regulations at 32 C.F.R. §§ 770.35 -.40, which state that the U.”
United States v. Acevedo-Delgado, 167 F. Supp. 2d 477 (D.P.R. 2001). “§ 1382 and 32 C.F.R. §§ 770.35 — .40. 1 Trial in this case is set for October 11, 2001.”
United States v. Gonzalez De Modesti, 145 F. Supp. 2d 171 (D.P.R. 2001). “28,2001, in the District of Puerto Rico and within the jurisdiction of this Court, that is, on Camp Garcia Naval Installation at Vieques, Puerto Rico, that is, on the lands reserved for the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, [the Defendants], did knowingly and…”
United States v. Mulero-Joubert, 289 F.3d 168 (1st Cir. 2002). “On April 30, 2001, the government filed a one-count information against each of the appellants, charging them with entering, “knowingly and unlawfully,” upon Camp Garcia, “for any purpose prohibited by law or lawful regulation, that is, 32 C.F.R. Section 770.35 through 770.40, 2…”
United States v. Ventura-Melendez (1st Cir. 2001). “See 32 C.F.R. §§ 770.35 - 770.40. The evidence therefore permitted the district court, acting as the fact-finder, to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that Ventura had violated § 1382.”
United States v. Raúl Mulero-Joubert, 289 F.3d 168 (1st Cir. 2002). “On April 30, 2001, the government filed a one-count information against each of the appellants, charging them with entering, "knowingly and unlawfully," upon Camp Garc a, "for any purpose prohibited by law or lawful regulation, that is, 32 C.F.R. Section 770.35 through 770.40, 2…”
United States v. Maldonado-Norat, 122 F. Supp. 2d 264 (D.P.R. 2000). “defendant, did knowingly and unlawfully go upon said Naval installation for any purpose prohibited by law or lawful regulation, that is, 32 CFR Section 770.35 through 770.40, without first having obtained permission from the Commanding Officer as required by the aforesaid…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.