37 C.F.R. § 301.1
Copyright Royalty Board
The Copyright Royalty Board is the institutional entity in the Library of Congress that will house the Copyright Royalty Judges, appointed pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 801(a), and their staff.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1985–2020 · leading case: Intercollegiate Broad. Sys., Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Bd., 684 F.3d 1332 (D.C. Cir. 2012).
Intercollegiate Broad. Sys., Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Bd., 684 F.3d 1332 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “The administrative body responsible for setting these terms has changed in name and structure over time, but the Copyright Royalty Board (the regulatory name for the collective entity composed of the CRJs and their staff, see 37 C.F.R. § 301.1 ) was established in its current…”
Intercollegiate Broadcast Sys., Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Bd., 574 F.3d 748 (D.C. Cir. 2009). “37 C.F.R. § 301.1 .) SoundExchange intervened to defend the Judges’ determination.”
Intercollegiate Broadcast Sys., Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Bd., 571 F.3d 69 (D.C. Cir. 2009). “37 C.F.R. § 301.1 .) SoundExchange intervened to defend the Judges’ determination.”
Indep. Producers Grp. v. Library of Cong., 759 F.3d 100 (D.C. Cir. 2014). “§ 801 (b); 37 C.F.R. § 301.1 . Those Royalty Judges are “appointed by the Librarian of Congress to encourage settlements and, when necessary, resolve statutory license disputes.”
Live365, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Bd., 698 F. Supp. 2d 25 (D.D.C. 2010). “” Copyright Royalty Board, 37 C.F.R. § 301.1 (2010). 2 . SoundExchange is a "not-for-profit organization that represents the interests of the recipients of the royalties set by the [CR Board].”
Indep. Producers Grp. v. CRB, 966 F.3d 799 (D.C. Cir. 2020). “37 C.F.R. § 301.1 . 9 certified copy of the claims filing from the Board and produced it in discovery.”
ACEMLA v. Copyright Royalty Tribunal, 763 F.2d 101 (2d Cir. 1985). “The Copyright Act and the CRT’s regulations promulgated thereunder, 37 C.F.R. §§ 301.1 to 308.2, contemplate a yearly filing of claims by all persons who claim to be entitled to share in the net compulsory license fees collected for the past year.”
George Johnson v. CRB (Pub.) (D.C. Cir. 2020). “” 37 C.F.R. § 301.1 . The three Copyright Royalty Judges are responsible for presiding over royalty proceedings and for making “determinations and adjustments of reasonable terms and rates of royalty payments[.”
George Johnson v. CRB (Pub.) (D.C. Cir. 2020). “” 37 C.F.R. § 301.1 . The three Copyright Royalty Judges are responsible for presiding over royalty proceedings and for making “determinations and adjustments of reasonable terms and rates of royalty payments[.”
Live365, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Bd. (D.D.C. 2010). “” Copyright Royalty Board, 37 C.F.R. § 301.1 (2010). Preliminary Injunction at 1.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.