C.F.R. » Title 39 » CHAPTER I—UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE › SUBCHAPTER K—ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS › PART 775—NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT PROCEDURES

39 C.F.R. § 775.1

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The purpose of this part is to establish certain procedures that the United States Postal Service (Postal Service) shall use to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), as amended.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1975–1992 · leading case: Chelsea Neighborhood Associations v. United States Postal Serv. & E. T. Klassen, Individually & as Postmaster Gen., 516 F.2d 378 (2d Cir. 1975).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Chelsea Neighborhood Associations v. United States Postal Serv. & E. T. Klassen, Individually & as Postmaster Gen., 516 F.2d 378 (2d Cir. 1975). · cites it 2× “” 39 C.F.R. § 775.1 (b). 7 . Even those laws that are made expressly applicable to the new Service by § 410(b) concern, almost exclusively, day-to-day affairs, e.”
City of Waltham v. United States Postal Serv., 786 F. Supp. 105 (D. Mass. 1992). · cites it 2× “39 C.F.R. § 775.1 , entitled "Purpose", states: These procedures implement the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Regulations ( 43 FR 55978 ) issued by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ).”
Morgan v. United States Postal Serv., 405 F. Supp. 413 (W.D. Mo. 1975). · cites it 2× “6 *419 After the second EIA was filed, the Postal Service sent a letter to plaintiff indicating its desire to discuss the possibility of “mitigating” the adverse environmental effects of the project under 39 C.F.R. § 775.1 (1975). Plaintiff’s counsel responded that plaintiff…”
City of Rochester v. United States Postal Serv., 541 F.2d 967 (2d Cir. 1976). · cites it 2× “While its regulations incorrectly state that NEPA and other environmental acts do not apply to it, 39 C.F.R. § 775.1 (b) (1975); see Chelsea Neighborhood Associations v.”
Higgins v. United States Postal Serv., 449 F. Supp. 1001 (D. Mass. 1978). “” 39 C.F.R. § 775.1 (b); 39 U.S.C. § 410 (a).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.