40 C.F.R. § 262.34
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2025 · leading case: United States v. Baytank (Houston), Inc., United States of Am. v. Baytank (Houston), Inc., 934 F.2d 599 (5th Cir. 1991).
United States v. Baytank (Houston), Inc., United States of Am. v. Baytank (Houston), Inc., 934 F.2d 599 (5th Cir. 1991). “40 C.F.R. § 262.34 (a) (1984). 16 Knowing violation of any of the safe storage conditions set forth in 40 C.”
United States v. Richard Heuer, United States of Am. v. Eugene Holderness, 4 F.3d 723 (9th Cir. 1993). ““[A] generator may accumulate hazardous waste on-site for 90 days or less without a permit,” 40 C.F.R. § 262.34 (a) (emphasis added), but otherwise no hazardous waste may be stored, treated, or disposed of except at a facility for which EPA has granted a permit, 42 U.”
United States v. Christian A. Hansen, 262 F.3d 1217 (11th Cir. 2001). “” 40 C.F.R. § 262.34 (a)(1)(h), (2), and (3).”
Am Int'l, Inc. v. Datacard Corp., Dbs, Inc., Addressograph Farrington, Inc., 106 F.3d 1342 (7th Cir. 1997). “Specifically, Datacard alleged that AMI was in violation of 40 C.F.R. § 262.34 , which prohibits generators from accumulating hazardous wastes for more than 90 days, as well as 40 C.”
United States v. Sims Bros. Constr., Inc., Robert L. Case, Mark E. Jerkins, & Amtek of Louisiana,inc, 277 F.3d 734 (5th Cir. 2001). “40 C.F.R. § 262.34 (d) (1997). 7 . 40 C.F.”
Fishel v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 617 F. Supp. 1531 (M.D. Penn. 1985). “See 40 C.F.R. § 262.34 . We agree with plaintiffs that this affidavit is irrelevant to past violations of RCRA.”
United States v. Power Eng'g Co., 10 F. Supp. 2d 1145 (D. Colo. 1998). “) As of August 3, 1992, PEC stored drums containing hazardous waste at the Facility for periods in excess of the ninety-day storage limitation for generator facilities set forth in 40 C.F.R. § 262.34 . (Stip-¶ 57.) PEC does not currently have an EPA or State of Colorado permit…”
Cornerstone Realty, Inc. v. Dresser Rand Co., 993 F. Supp. 107 (D. Conn. 1998). “40 C.F.R. § 262.34 (b) (1996). 5 . 28 U.S.”
Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Wheelabrator Tech. Inc., 725 F. Supp. 758 (S.D.N.Y. 1989). “40 C.F.R. § 262.34 , 6 NYCRR § 372.2(a)(8).”
Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. The City of Chicago, 948 F.2d 345 (7th Cir. 1991). “40 C.F.R. § 262.34 . Generators of hazardous waste also must maintain certain records, and file biennial reports with the EPA Regional Administrator.”
Titan Wheel Corp. of Iowa v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 291 F. Supp. 2d 899 (S.D. Iowa 2003). “40 C.F.R. § 262.34 (a). However, a large quantity generator that exceeds the ninety-day limit must comply with RCRA’s hazardous waste management regulations.”
Nat'l Solid Wastes Mgmt. Ass'n v. Alabama Dep't of Env't Mgmt., 910 F.2d 713 (11th Cir. 1990). “See 40 C.F.R. § 262.34 (1989). Be *725 cause the pre-approval regulations set no limit on how long Alabama can delay in responding to a request for approval, the pre-approval process can cause waste generators who wish to dispose of wastes in Alabama to expend time and money not…”
— 40 C.F.R. § 262.34(a)(1)(ii) — 1 case
Barrett Refining Corp. v. Mississippi Comm'n on Env't Quality, 751 So. 2d 1104 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.