C.F.R. » Title 40 » CHAPTER I—ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY › SUBCHAPTER I—SOLID WASTES › PART 261—IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE › Subpart A—General

40 C.F.R. § 261.5

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases, 1983–2015 · leading case: United States v. S. Union Co., 630 F.3d 17 (1st Cir. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. S. Union Co., 630 F.3d 17 (1st Cir. 2010). · cites it 6× “40 C.F.R. §§ 261.5 (a)(2) (outlining limited regulation of CESQGs), 270.”
United States v. S. Union Co., 643 F. Supp. 2d 201 (D.R.I. 2009). · cites it 7× “See 40 C.F.R. § 261.5 (b) (2008). As the name implies, however, the exemption is conditional, and in order to qualify for it a generator of hazardous waste must satisfy several requirements.”
State v. Uretek, Inc., 543 A.2d 709 (Conn. 1988). · cites it 2× “40 C.F.R. § 261.5 . It is undisputed that Uretek is a small quantity generator.”
United States v. Sims Bros. Constr., Inc., Robert L. Case, Mark E. Jerkins, & Amtek of Louisiana,inc, 277 F.3d 734 (5th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2× “40 C.F.R. § 261.5 (a). Entities that qualify for CESQG status are subject to less stringent permitting requirements than larger quantity generators.”
Hazardous Waste Treatment Council v. U.S. Env't Prot. Agency, Edison Elec. Inst., Intervenors [Hwtc Ii], 861 F.2d 277 (D.C. Cir. 1988). “10,146, 10,153 (1986) (codified as amended at 40 C.F.R. § 261.5 (1988)), and that determination has not been challenged.”
Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Wheelabrator Tech. Inc., 725 F. Supp. 758 (S.D.N.Y. 1989). · cites it 2× “” 40 C.F.R. § 261.5 (g)(3)(iv). It would make no sense to allow small quantity generators to dispose of their waste in a facility licensed to deal with municipal or industrial waste and then to deem that facility a hazardous waste disposal site subject to regulation as such.”
Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Wheelabrator Tech., Inc., Westchester Resco Co., L.P., 931 F.2d 211 (2d Cir. 1991). · cites it 3× “” See 40 C.F.R. § 261.5 (a) (defining the term).”
State Ex Rel. Webster v. Missouri Resource Recovery, Inc., 825 S.W.2d 916 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992). “See 40 CFR § 261.5 (f), incorporated into 10 CSR 25-4.”
United States v. E. of New Jersey, Inc., 770 F. Supp. 964 (D.N.J. 1991). · cites it 2× “Under 40 C.F.R. § 261.5 , “[a] generator is a conditionally exempt small quantity generator in a calendar month if he generates no more than 100 kilograms of hazardous waste in that month.”
United States v. S. Union Co. (1st Cir. 2010). · cites it 6× “40 C.F.R. §§ 261.5 (a)(2) (outlining limited regulation of CESQGs), 270.”
Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Lamphier, 714 F.2d 331 (4th Cir. 1983). “40 C.F.R. § 261.5 . Lamphier asserts that he falls within this exemption because the quantity of material stored and eventually incinerated on his property was less than one thousand kilograms.”
United States v. Indiana Woodtreating Corp., 686 F. Supp. 218 (S.D. Ind. 1988). “§ 6921 , and the regulations thereunder at 40 C.F.R. § 261.5 , the small quantity generator exemption applied in 1980 only to persons who generated less than 1,000 kilograms of hazardous waste in a month, and who stored no more than that amount on site.”
Show all 19 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.