43 C.F.R. § 1601.0-1

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The purpose of this subpart is to establish in regulations a process for the development, approval, maintenance, amendment and revision of resource management plans, and the use of existing plans for public lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management.

[48 FR 20368, May 5, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 89661, Dec. 12, 2016; 82 FR 60555, Dec. 21, 2017]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2002–2010 · leading case: Oregon Nat. Desert Ass'n v. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 625 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2010).
Oregon Nat. Desert Ass'n v. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 625 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2010). “” 43 C.F.R. § 1601.0-1 . We use “land use plan” and "resource management plan” interchangeably.”
Oregon Nat. Desert Ass'n v. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 531 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 2008). “” 43 C.F.R. § 1601.0-1 . We use "land use plan” and "resource management plan” interchangeably.”
Shasta Resources Council v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 629 F. Supp. 2d 1045 (E.D. Cal. 2009). “43 C.F.R. § 1601.0-1 . In preparing an RMP, the FLPMA requires, among other things, that BLM “give priority to the designation and protection of areas of critical environmental concern” and “weigh long-term benefits to the public against short-term benefits.”
S. Utah Wilderness All. v. Norton, 301 F.3d 1217 (10th Cir. 2002). “” 43 C.F.R. § 1601.0-1 (2001) (emphasis added).”
S. Utah v. Norton (10th Cir. 2004). “” 43 C.F.R. § 1601.0-1 (2001) (emphasis added).”
Oregon Nat. Desert Ass'n v. Bureau of Land Mgmt. (9th Cir. 2008). “” 43 C.F.R. § 1601.0-1 . We use “land use plan” and “resource man- agement plan” interchangeably.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.