C.F.R. » Title 47 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION › SUBCHAPTER B—COMMON CARRIER SERVICES › PART 51—INTERCONNECTION › Subpart E—Exemptions, Suspensions, and Modifications of Requirements of Section 251 of the Act

47 C.F.R. § 51.405

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1997–2010 · leading case: Iowa Utils. Bd. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States of Am., 219 F.3d 744 (8th Cir. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Iowa Utils. Bd. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States of Am., 219 F.3d 744 (8th Cir. 2000). · cites it 7× “1997), we concluded, in relevant part, that (1) the FCC exceeded its jurisdiction in promulgating various pricing rules; (2) the FCC exceeded its jurisdiction in promulgating 47 C.F.R. § 51.405 , regarding rural exemptions; (3) the FCC exceeded its jurisdiction in promulgating…”
Appeal of Union Tel. Co., 999 A.2d 336 (N.H. 2010). “” 47 C.F.R. § 51.405 (c) (2009). Union’s duties under federal law to provide potential competitive local exchange carriers with interconnection to its network are not at issue in this appeal.”
Iowa Utils. Bd. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 120 F.3d 753 (8th Cir. 1997). · cites it 2× “The Commission’s rule, 47 C.F.R. § 51.405 , purports to implement subsection 251(f), which governs exemptions, suspensions, and modifications.”
ACS of Alaska, Inc. v. Regulatory Comm'n, 81 P.3d 292 (Alaska 2003). · cites it 3× “" 22 The Eighth Circuit also looked to the legislative history of the Telecommunications Act to support its conclusion that the FCC exceeded its authority in promulgating 47 C.F.R. § 51.405 (a): Congress rejected both a Senate bill and a House bill that gave the FCC concurrent…”
Iowa Utils. Bd. v. FCC (8th Cir. 2000). · cites it 7× “1997), we concluded, in relevant part, that (1) the FCC exceeded its jurisdiction in promulgating various pricing rules; (2) the FCC exceeded its jurisdiction in promulgating 47 C.F.R. § 51.405 , regarding rural exemptions; (3) the FCC exceeded its jurisdiction in promulgating…”
— 47 C.F.R. § 51.405(a) — 1 case
ACS of Alaska, Inc. v. Regulatory Comm'n, 81 P.3d 292 (Alaska 2003). “" 22 The Eighth Circuit also looked to the legislative history of the Telecommunications Act to support its conclusion that the FCC exceeded its authority in promulgating 47 C.F.R. § 51.405 (a): Congress rejected both a Senate bill and a House bill that gave the FCC concurrent…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.