49 C.F.R. § 390.13
Aiding or abetting violations
No person shall aid, abet, encourage, or require a motor carrier or its employees to violate the rules of this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2004–2025 · leading case: Camp v. TNT Logistics Corp., 553 F.3d 502 (7th Cir. 2009).
Camp v. TNT Logistics Corp., 553 F.3d 502 (7th Cir. 2009). “Statutory Duty On appeal, Camp first claims that TNT and Trelleborg are liable for negligence based on two provisions of the FMCSR, 49 C.F.R. §§ 390.13 and 392.9(a)(1), which are explained in detail below.”
Schramm v. Foster, 341 F. Supp. 2d 536 (D. Maryland 2004). “(2) Plaintiffs also assert a claim under 49 C.F.R. § 390.13 , alleging that Robinson aided and abetted Groff Brothers and Foster in violating the hours of service regulations by failing to inquire about Foster’s available driving hours and by prescribing a pick-up and delivery…”
ONB Ins. Grp., Inc., d/b/a Old Nat'l Ins., & Joseph E. Kenworthy v. The Est. of Joann Marie Megel, the Est. of Edward J. Megel, Darcy Megel, 107 N.E.3d 484 (Ind. Ct. App. 2018). “306 and 49 CFR § 390.13 into Indiana law. 49 CFR § 385.”
M.T. v. Saum, 3 F. Supp. 3d 617 (W.D. Ky. 2014). “3 (e)(l)-(2), requiring employers to "be knowledgeable of and comply with all regulations contained in this subchapter which are applicable to that motor carrier's operations” and requiring employers to instruct every driver on "all applicable regulations in this subchapter”; 49…”
Bartlett Grain Co. v. Kansas Corp. Comm'n, 256 P.3d 867 (Kan. 2011). “Factual and Procedural Background The KCC initiated this action by issuing a show cause order alleging Bartlett violated “Title 49 C.F.R. 390.13 (2003) as adopted by K.S.”
Carlson Auction Serv., Inc. v. Kansas Corp. Comm'n, 413 P.3d 448 (Kan. Ct. App. 2018). “The Commission also argues that Midwest Crane & Rigging, LLC is distinguishable because it dealt with federal statutes instead of state statutes and did not actually interpret K.”
Schlegel v. Li Chen Song, 547 F. Supp. 2d 792 (N.D. Ohio 2008). “He alleges that Top One hired drivers who did not speak English, failed to conduct background checks, and allowed drivers to disregard logging rules.”
Russ v. Ecklund Logistics, Inc. (D. Minnesota 2022). “Michaels to violate the hours of service regulations in violation of 49 C.F.R. § 390.13 (which prohibits any person from aiding, abetting, and encouraging violations of the FMCSRs) (id.”
Camp, Lola v. TNT Logistics Corp (7th Cir. 2009). “Statutory Duty On appeal, Camp first claims that TNT and Trelleborg are liable for negligence based on two provisions of the FMCSR, 49 C.F.R. §§ 390.13 and 392.9(a)(1), which are explained in detail below.”
Porter v. T & T Farms, Inc. (N.D. Ind. 2022). “133 and is liable 3 49 C.F.R. § 390.13 provides that “[n]o person shall aid, abet, encourage, or require a motor carrier or its employees to violate the rules of this chapter.”
Fetinci v. Rayco Logistics, LLC (E.D. Mich. 2024). “49 C.F.R. § 390.13 .” (Id. at ¶ 57). ANALYSIS I.”
King v. JDM Expedite Inc. (N.D. Ill. 2024). “They rely on 49 C.F.R. § 390.13 , which provides, “No person shall aid, abet, encourage, or require a motor carrier or its employees to violate the rules of this chapter.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.