C.F.R. » Title 49 » CHAPTER III—FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION › SUBCHAPTER B—FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY REGULATIONS › PART 392—DRIVING OF COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLES › Subpart A—General

49 C.F.R. § 392.6

Schedules to conform with speed limits

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

No motor carrier shall schedule a run nor permit nor require the operation of any commercial motor vehicle between points in such period of time as would necessitate the commercial motor vehicle being operated at speeds greater than those prescribed by the jurisdictions in or through which the commercial motor vehicle is being operated.

[33 FR 19732, Dec. 25, 1968, as amended at 60 FR 38746, July 28, 1995]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1977–2025 · leading case: Swenson v. Yellow Transp., Inc., 317 F. Supp. 2d 51 (D. Mass. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Swenson v. Yellow Transp., Inc., 317 F. Supp. 2d 51 (D. Mass. 2004). · cites it 4× “Further, according to the plaintiffs, such conduct on the part of Yellow violated 49 C.F.R. § 392.6 of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, which provides in relevant part that: No motor carrier shall require or permit .”
Rosenberg v. Packerland Packing Co., 370 N.E.2d 1235 (Ill. App. Ct. 1977). “” 49 C.F.R. §392.6 (1976). “ * 0 ° 35 Fed. Reg.”
Vargas v. FMI, Inc., 80 Cal. Comp. Cases 111 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015). “” ( 49 C.F.R. § 392.6 (2014).) A motor carrier “may not require or permit a driver to operate a commercial motor vehicle unless .”
Conley v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 521 F. Supp. 2d 713 (E.D. Tenn. 2007). “3 (establishing maximum driving times); 49 C.F.R. § 392.6 (motor earners may not schedule runs requiring the violation of speed limits).”
Cushing v. Casella (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). · cites it 4× “Plaintiffs apparently oppose by arguing that Casella fails to account for “federal motor carrier safety regulation 49 CFR 392.6 that prohibits motor carriers from either ‘requir[ing]’ or ‘permit[ting]’ their truck drivers to break the speed limit ….”
Starr Indem. & Liab. Co. v. YRC, Inc. (N.D. Ill. 2018). “§§ 504 , 508, 31133, 31136, 31149, and 31502); 49 C.F.R. §§ 392.6 , 392.96 (citing as authority 49 U.”
Moore v. Knight Refrigerated LLC (N.D. Tex. 2025). “29 49 C.F.R. § 392.6 . IT ISSO ORDERED this Ist day of April, 2025.”
Elizabeth Santana, Individually & as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of Rojelio Santana, & as Next Friend of Diana Santana, Rojelio Santana, Jr., Marissa Santana, Pauline Santana & Frederico Santana v. Arpin Am. Moving Sys., LLC & Paul Arpin Van Lines, Inc. (Tex. App. 2009). “3 (2008) (ill or fatigued driver); 49 C.F.R. § 392.6 (schedules to conform with speed limits); 49 C.”
Elizabeth Santana, Individually & as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of Rojelio Santana, & as Next Friend of Diana Santana, Rojelio Santana, Jr., Marissa Santana, Pauline Santana & Frederico Santana v. Arpin Am. Moving Sys., LLC & Paul Arpin Van Lines, Inc. (Tex. App. 2009). “3 (2008) (ill or fatigued driver); 49 C.F.R. § 392.6 (schedules to conform with speed limits); 49 C.”
Powell v. Dean Foods Co., 2013 IL App (1st) 82513 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “” 49 C.F.R. § 392.6 (2002). - 41 - ¶ 203 On the day of this collision, defendant Reeves began driving at 8:30 a.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.