C.F.R. » Title 5 » CHAPTER XIV—FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY AND FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL › SUBCHAPTER C—FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY AND GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY › PART 2421—MEANING OF TERMS AS USED IN THIS SUBCHAPTER

5 C.F.R. § 2421.11

Party

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Party means:

(a) Any labor organization, employing agency or activity or individual filing a charge, petition, or request;

(b) Any labor organization or agency or activity

(1) Named as

(i) A charged party in a charge,

(ii) A respondent in a complaint, or

(iii) An employing agency or activity or an incumbent labor organization in a petition;

(2) Whose intervention in a proceeding has been permitted or directed by the Authority; or

(3) Who participated as a party

(i) In a matter that was decided by an agency head under 5 U.S.C. 7117, or

(ii) In a matter where the award of an arbitrator was issued; and

(c) The General Counsel, or the General Counsel's designated representative, in appropriate proceedings.

[60 FR 67291, Dec. 29, 1995]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1990–1997 · leading case: Dep't of Health & Human Servs. Fam. Support Admin. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 920 F.2d 45 (D.C. Cir. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dep't of Health & Human Servs. Fam. Support Admin. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 920 F.2d 45 (D.C. Cir. 1990). “” 5 C.F.R. § 2421.11 (a). 2 Petitioner challenges that definition of compelling as too restrictive, but its challenge is lacking both analytical and legal support.”
Fed. Labor Relations Auth. v. Nat'l Aeronautics & Space Admin., 120 F.3d 1208 (11th Cir. 1997). “The Authority nevertheless determined that it was proper for it to address that issue because NASA-HQ was a party pursuant to 5 C.F.R. § 2421.11 (b)(l)(i) (“party” means any agency “named as [a] charged party in a charge”), and because the Authority had previously addressed sua…”
Flra v. Nasa (11th Cir. 1997). “The Authority nevertheless determined that it was proper for it to address that issue because NASA-HQ was a party pursuant to 5 C.F.R. § 2421.11 (b)(1)(i) ("party" means any agency "named as [a] charged party in a charge"), and because the Authority had previously addressed sua…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.