C.F.R. » Title 50 » CHAPTER I—UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR › SUBCHAPTER B—TAKING, POSSESSION, TRANSPORTATION, SALE, PURCHASE, BARTER, EXPORTATION, AND IMPORTATION OF WILDLIFE AND PLANTS › PART 10—GENERAL PROVISIONS › Subpart A—Introduction

50 C.F.R. § 10.1

Purpose of regulations

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The regulations of this Subchapter B are promulgated to implement the following statutes enforced by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service which regulate the taking, possession, transportation, sale, purchase, barter, exportation, and importation of wildlife:

Lacey Act, 18 U.S.C. 42. Lacey Act Amendments of 1981, 16 U.S.C. 3371-3378. Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. 703-712. Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. 668a-668d. Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. 1531-1543. Tariff Classification Act of 1962, 19 U.S.C. 1202, [Schedule 1, Part 15D, Headnote 2(d), T.S.U.S.]. Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, 16 U.S.C. 742a-742j-l. Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, 16 U.S.C. 1361-1384, 1401-1407.[38 FR 22015, Aug. 15, 1973, as amended at 53 FR 6649, Mar. 2, 1988]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 2001–2019 · leading case: Turtle Island Restoration Network v. United States Dep't of Com., 878 F.3d 725 (9th Cir. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Turtle Island Restoration Network v. United States Dep't of Com., 878 F.3d 725 (9th Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “§§ 703–12; 50 C.F.R. § 10.1 , which strictly prohibits the taking of any migratory bird the Act protects except under the terms of a valid permit issued by the Secretary of the Interior, id.”
Fund for Animals v. Kempthorne, 538 F.3d 124 (2d Cir. 2008). “See 50 C.F.R. § 10.1 . When migratory birds converge in large numbers, they may consume large quantities of local plants, fish, or other species.”
Hill, Joyce M. v. Norton, Gale A., 275 F.3d 98 (D.C. Cir. 2001). “, 50 C.F.R. § 10.1 (1961). In 1965, the Secretary issued a Notice of Proposed Rule Making which sought to, among other things, “further clarify and *102 define the term ‘migratory birds’ ” by adding a requirement that birds be “indigenous to the United States.”
Pub. Employees for Env't Responsibility v. Beaudreau, 25 F. Supp. 3d 67 (D.D.C. 2014). “The FWS, which implements and enforces the Migratory Bird Treaty Act on behalf of the Secretary of the Interior, 50 C.F.R. § 10.1 , maintains a list of protected migratory birds as outlined in the Act’s implementing regulations, id.”
Tribe v. Ashe, 92 F. Supp. 3d 1160 (D. Wyo. 2015). “See 50 C.F.R. § 10.1 (2015) (“The regulations of this Subchapter B are promulgated to implement the following statutes enforced by the U.”
Global Tropical Imports & Exports Llc v. Bernhardt, 366 F. Supp. 3d 110 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “" See 50 C.F.R. §§ 10.1 - 24.12. The Court rejects Global's argument that the Department's briefing violated Local Civil Rule 7.”
Global Tropical Imports & Exports LLC v. Zinke (D.D.C. 2019). “” See 50 C.F.R. §§ 10.1 – 24.12. 6 The Court rejects Global’s argument that the Department’s briefing violated Local Civil Rule 7.”
['Pub. Employees for Env't Responsibility v. Bromwich'] (D.D.C. 2014). “§ 703 (a); see also 50 C.F.R. § 10.13 (a). 8 Migratory Bird Treaty Act on behalf of the Secretary of the Interior, 50 C.”
Fund for Animals v. Kempthorne (2d Cir. 2008). “See 50 C.F.R. § 10.1 . 30 When migratory birds converge in large numbers, they 31 may consume large quantities of local plants, fish, or other 32 species.”
Fund for Animals v. Kempthorne (2d Cir. 2008). “See 50 C.F.R. § 10.1 . 30 When migratory birds converge in large numbers, they 31 may consume large quantities of local plants, fish, or other 32 species.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.