C.F.R. » Title 50 » CHAPTER I—UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR › SUBCHAPTER B—TAKING, POSSESSION, TRANSPORTATION, SALE, PURCHASE, BARTER, EXPORTATION, AND IMPORTATION OF WILDLIFE AND PLANTS › PART 21—MIGRATORY BIRD PERMITS › Subpart B—Regulatory Authorizations for Migratory Birds

50 C.F.R. § 21.47

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2005–2016 · leading case: Fund for Animals v. Kempthorne, 538 F.3d 124 (2d Cir. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fund for Animals v. Kempthorne, 538 F.3d 124 (2d Cir. 2008). · cites it 3× “Agency Proceedings In response to complaints that cormorants’ fish-eating habits were becoming increasingly costly to aquaculture and other industries, the FWS in 1998 adopted an Aquaculture Depredation Order, 50 C.F.R. § 21.47 , allowing the taking of cormorants without a…”
Fund for Animals v. Norton, 365 F. Supp. 2d 394 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). · cites it 5× “The ADO permits landowners, operators and tenants of aquaculture facilities to utilize firearms to take double-crested cormorants when the birds are found committing or about to commit acts of depredation on the aquaculture stock.”
Pub. Employees for Env't Responsibility v. United States Fish & Wildlife Serv., 189 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2016). · cites it 2× “See 50 C.F.R. §§ 21.47 , 21.48. On March 29, 2016, the Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on their National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) claims and remanded the depredation orders to FWS.”
Pub. Employees for Env't Responsibility v. United States Fish & Wildlife Serv., 177 F. Supp. 3d 146 (D.D.C. 2016). · cites it 8× “Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) in 1998 in response to complaints that the fish-eating habits of the cormorants were becoming increasingly costly to aquaculture and other industries.”
Fund for Animals v. Kempthorne (2d Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “9 Agency Proceedings 10 In response to complaints that cormorants' fish-eating 11 habits were becoming increasingly costly to aquaculture and other 12 industries, the FWS in 1998 adopted an Aquaculture Depredation 13 Order, 50 C.F.R. § 21.47 , allowing the taking of cormorants…”
Fund for Animals v. Kempthorne (2d Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “9 Agency Proceedings 10 In response to complaints that cormorants' fish-eating 11 habits were becoming increasingly costly to aquaculture and other 12 industries, the FWS in 1998 adopted an Aquaculture Depredation 13 Order, 50 C.F.R. § 21.47 , allowing the taking of cormorants…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.