7 C.F.R. § 1410.21
Obligations of the Commodity Credit Corporation
CCC will:
(a) Share up to 50 percent of the cost with participants of installing eligible practices specified in the conservation plan for which CCC determines that cost sharing is appropriate and in the public interest, and at the levels and rates of cost-sharing determined in accordance with the provisions of this part; and
(b) Pay to eligible participants for a period of years not in excess of the contract period an annual rental payment, including applicable and available incentive payments, in such amounts as may be specified in the CRP contract.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2000–2019 · leading case: Welty v. United States, 926 F.3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2019).
Welty v. United States, 926 F.3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2019). “See 7 C.F.R. § 1410.21 . But Givens' alleged receipt of financial compensation for participating in the CRP is insufficient, standing alone, to show that he was acting as an agent of the United States when he constructed and maintained his levee, particularly given that, as…”
Mark Mittelstadt v. Sonny Perdue, 913 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2019). “7 C.F.R. § 1410.21 (a). Rental payments combined with cost-sharing are designed to assure landowners of a return on the land without having to risk large sums of money to adopt conservation practices.”
In Re Isenbart, 255 B.R. 62 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2000). “7 C.F.R. § 1410.21 (b) requires that the government pay the participant in the CRP, "an *66 annual rental payment in such amounts as may be specified in the CRP contract.”
Mark Mittelstadt v. Sonny Perdue (7th Cir. 2019). “7 C.F.R. § 1410.21 (a). Rental payments combined with cost-sharing are designed to assure landowners of a return on the land with- out having to risk large sums of money to adopt conservation practices.”
Mark Mittelstadt v. Sonny Perdue (7th Cir. 2019). “7 C.F.R. § 1410.21 (a). Rental payments combined with cost-sharing are designed to assure landowners of a return on the land with- out having to risk large sums of money to adopt conservation practices.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.