9 C.F.R. § 201.1

Meaning of words

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Words used in this part in the singular form shall be deemed to import the plural, and vice versa, as the case may demand.

[19 FR 4524, July 22, 1954]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1952–1992 · leading case: Klemme Cattle Co. v. Westwind Cattle Co., 274 S.E.2d 738 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980).
Klemme Cattle Co. v. Westwind Cattle Co., 274 S.E.2d 738 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “These regulations published in the Federal Register and codified at 9 CFR 201.1, et seq., are constructive notice to the parties in this action.”
Dale Van Wyk & Van's Livestock, Inc. v. Robert Bergland, Sec'y of Agric., 570 F.2d 701 (8th Cir. 1978). “, by engaging in unfair or deceptive practices or devices, and (2) the regulations promulgated under the Act by the Secretary of Agriculture, 9 C.F.R. § 201.1 et seq., by failing to make sufficient funds available for the payment *703 of drafts and checks issued for the purchase…”
Nat'l Beef Packing Co. v. Sec'y of Agric. & United States of Am., 605 F.2d 1167 (10th Cir. 1979). “, and the Regulations of the Packers and Stockyards Administration, 9 C.F.R. § 201.1 , et seq. Neither of these grounds is availing, and we therefore affirm.”
Cobb v. Yeutter, 889 F.2d 724 (6th Cir. 1989). “After an investigation conducted in late 1984, the Administrator, Packers and Stockyards Administration, United States Department of Agriculture, filed a complaint on August 23, 1985, charging Cobb with willful violations of the Act and of regulations issued thereunder ( 9…”
Cooper v. Am. Auto. Ins., 978 F.3d 602 (10th Cir. 1992). “The relevant regulations are set out at 9 C.F.R. § 201.1 , et seq. (1992). The Packers and Stockyards Act bond requirements exist to protect livestock sellers against losses from sales to insolvent or defaulting buyers.”
Fairbank v. Hardin, 429 F.2d 264 (9th Cir. 1970). “…1256 , 90 L.Ed. 1453 (1946); Shapiro v. United States, 335 U.S. 1, 33-36 , 68 S.Ct. 1375 , 92 L.Ed. 1787 (1948) 3 9 C.F.R. 201.1, et seq”
Fairbank v. Hardin, 429 F.2d 264 (9th Cir. 1970). “…1256 , 90 L.Ed. 1453 (1946); Shapiro v. United States, 335 U.S. 1, 33-36 , 68 S.Ct. 1375 , 92 L. Ed. 1787 (1948). . 9 C.F.R. § 201.1 , et seq.”
Thornton v. United States, 121 Ct. Cl. 520 (Ct. Cl. 1952). “Regulations issued pursuant to the statute, 9 C. F. R. §§ 201.1 to 201.23 as amended January 8, 1943, 8 Fed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.