9 C.F.R. § 3.128

Space requirements

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Enclosures shall be constructed and maintained so as to provide sufficient space to allow each animal to make normal postural and social adjustments with adequate freedom of movement. Inadequate space may be indicated by evidence of malnutrition, poor condition, debility, stress, or abnormal behavior patterns.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1983–2017 · leading case: Graham v. San Antonio Zoological Soc'y, 261 F. Supp. 3d 711 (W.D. Tex. 2017).
Graham v. San Antonio Zoological Soc'y, 261 F. Supp. 3d 711 (W.D. Tex. 2017). · cites it 2× “enclosures fail to comply with 9 C.F.R. § 3.128 ... There is no evidence that any of the bears are malnourished, in poor condition, or physically weak .”
Union Cnty. Jail Inmates v. Dibuono, 718 F.2d 1247 (3rd Cir. 1983). · cites it 2× “See 9 C.F.R. §§ 3.128 , 3.78(b) (1983). In arriving at so fundamentally inhumane a result, moreover, the panel completely ignored the limits of their reviewing authority imposed by Rules 52 and 53.”
Leider v. Lewis (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “(See 9 C.F.R. § 3.128 [ensuring freedom of movement]; 9 C.”
Leider v. Lewis (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “(See 9 C.F.R. § 3.128 [ensuring freedom of movement]; 9 C.”
Leider v. Lewis, 16 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 527 (Cal. Ct. App. 2nd 2016). · cites it 2× “The City does not contend, and we do not believe, that such a limited remedy amounts to a substantial injustice.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.