9 C.F.R. § 302.1

Establishments requiring inspection

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Inspection under the regulations in this subchapter is required at:

(1) Every establishment, except as provided in § 303.1 (a) and (b), or (c) of this subchapter, in which any livestock are slaughtered for transportation or sale as articles of commerce, or in which any products of, or derived from, carcasses of livestock are, wholly or in part, prepared for transportation or sale as articles of commerce, which are intended for use as human food;

(2) Every establishment, except as provided in § 303.1 (a) and (b), or (d) of this subchapter, within any State or organized Territory which is designated pursuant to paragraph 301(c) of the Act, at which any livestock are slaughtered or any products of any livestock are prepared, for use as human food solely for distribution within such jurisdiction; and

(3) Every establishment, except as provided in § 303.1 (a) and (b) of this subchapter, that is designated by the Administrator pursuant to paragraph 301(c) of the Act as one producing adulterated products which would clearly endanger the public health.

[35 FR 15556, Oct. 3, 1970, as amended at 36 FR 12002, June 24, 1971]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1975–2014 · leading case: Rath Packing Co. v. Becker, 530 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir. 1975).
Rath Packing Co. v. Becker, 530 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir. 1975). · cites it 2× “Rath is a nation-wide processor and seller of meat products, including bacon, and maintains a meat-packing establishment at Vernon, California, which is subject to federal inspection under the Wholesome Meat Act and 9 CFR 302.1 as an establishment in which “any products of * * *…”
The Rath Packing Co., a Corp., Counter-Defendant & v. M. H. Becker, as Dir. of the Cnty. of Los Angeles Dep't of Weights & Measures, & Cross-Appellant, C. B. Christensen, as Dir. of Agric. of the State of California, Intervenor, & Cross-Appellant. The Rath Packing Co., a Corp., & v. Joseph W. Jones, as Dir. of the Cnty. of Riverside Dep't of Weights & Measures, & Cross-Appellant, 530 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir. 1976). · cites it 2× “2 Rath is a nation-wide processor and seller of meat products, including bacon, and maintains a meat-packing establishment at Vernon, California, which is subject to federal inspection under the Wholesome Meat Act and 9 CFR 302.1 as an establishment in which 'any products of * *…”
People v. Santorsola, 225 Cal. App. Supp. 4th 12 (Cal. App. Dep’t Super. Ct. 2014). “” ( 9 C.F.R. § 302.1 (a)(l)-(3) (2014).) 3 The Code of Federal Regulations requires that “All livestock offered for slaughter in an official establishment shall be examined and inspected on the day of and before slaughter unless, because of unusual circumstances, prior…”
— 9 C.F.R. § 302.1(a) — 2 cases
Rath Packing Co. v. Becker, 530 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir. 1975). “Rath is a nation-wide processor and seller of meat products, including bacon, and maintains a meat-packing establishment at Vernon, California, which is subject to federal inspection under the Wholesome Meat Act and 9 CFR 302.1 as an establishment in which “any products of * * *…”
The Rath Packing Co., a Corp., Counter-Defendant & v. M. H. Becker, as Dir. of the Cnty. of Los Angeles Dep't of Weights & Measures, & Cross-Appellant, C. B. Christensen, as Dir. of Agric. of the State of California, Intervenor, & Cross-Appellant. The Rath Packing Co., a Corp., & v. Joseph W. Jones, as Dir. of the Cnty. of Riverside Dep't of Weights & Measures, & Cross-Appellant, 530 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir. 1976). “2 Rath is a nation-wide processor and seller of meat products, including bacon, and maintains a meat-packing establishment at Vernon, California, which is subject to federal inspection under the Wholesome Meat Act and 9 CFR 302.1 as an establishment in which 'any products of * *…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.