9 C.F.R. § 95.2

Region of origin

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

No products or materials specified in the regulations in this part shall be imported unless there be shown upon the commercial invoice, or in some other manner satisfactory to the Deputy Administrator, Veterinary Services, the name of the region of origin of such product or material: Provided, That the region of origin shall be construed to mean (a) in the case of an animal byproduct, the region in which such product was taken from an animal or animals, and (b) in the case of other materials, the region in which such materials were produced.

[28 FR 5981, June 13, 1963, as amended at 62 FR 56024, Oct. 28, 1997]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1994–1994 · leading case: United States v. Richard M. Mitchell, 39 F.3d 465 (4th Cir. 1994).
United States v. Richard M. Mitchell, 39 F.3d 465 (4th Cir. 1994). · cites it 4× “61 (1986) (“the FWS regulation”); and (3) show the country of origin of the hides and horns on a commercial invoice or in some other manner satisfactory to the Deputy Administrator of Veterinary Services as required by 9 C.F.R. § 95.2 (1987) (“the Agriculture regulation”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.