Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 14
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-10-101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This article shall be known and may be cited as the "Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act".

Source: L. 71: R&RE, p. 520, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 46-1-1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 103 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1975–2026 · leading case: In Re the Marriage of Hunt, 909 P.2d 525 (Colo. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re the Marriage of Hunt, 909 P.2d 525 (Colo. 1995). · cites it 6× “A trial court's distribution of property between spouses upon dissolution is controlled by the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act (the UDMA), §§ 14-10-101 to -133, 6B C.R.S. (1987 & 1995 Supp.”
IN RE the MARRIAGE OF Delinda EVANS, & Kenneth Evans, 504 P.3d 988 (Colo. Ct. App. 2021). “But district court magistrates have the power to preside over proceedings arising under the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act (UDMA), §§ 14-10-101 to - 133, C.R.S. 2021, and the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure apply to all proceedings under the UDMA, § 14-10-105(1), C.”
In re the Marriage of de Koning, 2016 CO 2 (Colo. 2016). “III - Analysis 118 The UDMA, §§ 14-10-101 to - 138, C.R.S8. (2015), contains separate sections *497 governing the major financial components of a dissolution proceeding.”
In re Marriage Heine, 2018 COA 154 (Colo. Ct. App. 2018). “11 ¶ 26 The White division first noted that the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act, sections 14-10-101 to -133, C.R.S. (2018), establishes procedures and considerations to enable courts to determine whether, when, and how much a parent should be required to pay to fulfill his…”
In re the Marriage of Dean & Cook, 2017 COA 51 (Colo. Ct. App. 2017). “In Colorado, parenting orders are comprehensively governed by the Colorado Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act, sections 14-10-101 to -133, C.R.S. 2016, but the majority does not cite and I am unaware of any statutory authority supporting the proposition that a custodial parent…”
In Re the Marriage of Ikeler, 161 P.3d 663 (Colo. 2007). · cites it 2× “The public policy underlying an award of attorney's fees in a marital dissolution proceeding is established in the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act, sections 14-10-101 to -133, C.R.S. (2006) ("UDMA") and has been articulated in the case law.”
IN RE the MARRIAGE OF Jeremy STRADTMANN, & Andrea Stradtmann, & Concerning El Paso Cnty. Child Support Servs., Intervenor., 506 P.3d 77 (Colo. Ct. App. 2021). “" In pari materia is a rule of statutory construction which requires that statutes relating to the same subject matter be construed together in order to gather the legislature's intent from the whole of the enactments.”
IN RE the MARRIAGE OF Penny Brabb TURILLI, & Cross-Appellee, & Steven Daniel Turilli, &, 507 P.3d 83 (Colo. Ct. App. 2021). “5(4), a term not otherwise used in the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act, sections 14-10-101 to - 133, C.R.S. 2021, or apparently in any other attorney fees statute.”
Burns v. McGraw-Hill Broad. Co., Inc., 659 P.2d 1351 (Colo. 1983). · cites it 4× “, section 14-10-101 et seq., C.R.S.1973. The Act, which has been adopted by eight states, [6] revised the divorce statute to eliminate all grounds other than irretrievable breakdown of the marriage, section 14-10-102, and provided that marital misconduct should play no part in…”
In re Marriage of Blaine, 2021 CO 13 (Colo. 2021). “2 ¶1 We agreed to review this marriage dissolution case to determine whether a spouse’s conveyance of his interest in a home through an interspousal transfer deed (“ITD”) automatically overcomes the presumption of marital property in the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act, §§…”
In Re the Marriage of McSoud, 131 P.3d 1208 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 3× “Alternatively, she contends that, if the court did not err in applying the statute, then § 14-10-101, et seq., C.R.S.2005, is unconstitutional as applied to her because it violates her right to raise her child in a manner protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments.”
In Re Marriage of Jones, 812 P.2d 1152 (Colo. 1991). · cites it 2× “Colorado's Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act, §§ 14-10-101 to -133, 6B C.R.S. (1987 & 1990 Supp.”
Show all 103 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.