Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-5-101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This article shall be known and may be cited as the "Uniform Interstate Family Support Act". Source: L. 2003: Entire part amended with relocations, p. 1241, § 2, effective July 1, 2004.

Editor's note: In 2003, the former § 14-5-101 was relocated to § 14-5-102.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 42 cases, 1977–2015 · leading case: In re the Marriage of Haddad, 93 P.3d 617 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004).
In re the Marriage of Haddad, 93 P.3d 617 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 5× “’ In this proceeding under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, § 14-5-101, et seq., C.R.S.2003 (UIFSA), Joseph M.”
McClure v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, 2015 COA 117 (Colo. Ct. App. 2015). “2014, and foreign family-support orders, see §§ 14-5-101 to—903, C.R.S. 2014, those methods are inapplicable here.”
In Re the Marriage of Hillstrom, 126 P.3d 315 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005). “, contending that (1) Nebraska has continuing exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over all child support matters, pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA), § 14-5-101, et seq., C.R.S.2005; and (2) the requirements of UIFSA had not been met.”
Vogan v. Cnty. of San Diego, 193 P.3d 336 (Colo. Ct. App. 2008). “Vogan, appeals from the trial court's order dismissing her action to terminate a wage assignment for lack of personal jurisdiction over defendants, County of San Diego and County of San Diego Department of Child Support Services We analyze her contentions under the Uniform…”
In Re the Marriage of Zinke, 967 P.2d 210 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998). “Wife contends that the Colorado court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to establish child support because the Montana court had previously issued a support order and, therefore, under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA), § 14-5-101, et seq., C.R.S.1998, retained…”
People Ex Rel. R.L.H., 942 P.2d 1386 (Colo. Ct. App. 1997). “The issue presented in this case is whether, in proceedings brought under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, § 14-5-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1996 Cum.Supp.”
Cnty. of Clearwater, Minn. v. Petrash, 598 P.2d 138 (Colo. 1979). · cites it 2× “We granted certiorari to review the decision of the court of appeals that a violation by one parent of the terms of a custody decree may be raised as a defense in an action against the other parent to obtain support under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act,…”
People v. Steiner, 640 P.2d 250 (Colo. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 2× “8), or in the case of uniform laws such as the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act, § 14-5-101 et seq., C.R.S.1973. I would affirm the judgment in its entirety.”
Glickman v. Mesigh, 615 P.2d 23 (Colo. 1980). · cites it 2× “1973, and a proceeding under the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), section 14-5-101 et seq., C.R.S. 1973. Section 14-5-104 of URESA states that the remedies provided therein are in addition to and not in substitution for any other remedies.”
In Re the Marriage of Morris, 32 P.3d 625 (Colo. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “Mother subsequently assigned her collection rights to intervenor, who commenced this action in 1998 for enforcement under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, C.R.S. § 14-5-101, et seq., C.R.8.2000. The parties stipulated to the amount of arrearag-es due from March 23,…”
Zimmerman v. Starnes, 35 B.R. 1018 (D. Colo. 1984). · cites it 2× “(West 1982); C.R.S. § 14-5-101, et seq. (1973). Under URESA, the rights and duties of support are determined by (1) the law of any state in which the supporting parent resided during the period for which support is sought, or (2) the law of the state where the supporting parent…”
McNeece v. McNeece, 562 P.2d 767 (Colo. Ct. App. 1977). “Defendant, Jackie McNeece, appeals a judgment entered pursuant to the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act, § 14-5-101, et seq., C.R.S.1973, ordering him to pay child support.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-5-101(19) — 2 cases
People ex rel. A.K., 72 P.3d 402 (Colo. Ct. App. 2003).
People Ex Rel. Ak, 72 P.3d 402 (Colo. Ct. App. 2003).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 14-5-101(21) — 1 case
In re the Marriage of Haddad, 93 P.3d 617 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “’ In this proceeding under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, § 14-5-101, et seq., C.R.S.2003 (UIFSA), Joseph M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.