Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 17
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 17-2-207 (2024)

Parole - regulations

✓ C.R.S. 2024: the 2025 and 2026 sessions are not included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) and (2) Repealed.

(3) Offenders on parole shall remain under legal custody and shall be subject at any time to be returned to a correctional facility.

(4) From and after the suspension, cancellation, or revocation of the parole of any prisoner and until his return to custody, he shall be deemed a parole violator and fugitive from justice, and no part of the time during which he was on parole shall be deemed a part of his term.

Source: L. 77: Entire title R&RE, p. 915, § 10, effective August 1. L. 79: (1) and (3) amended, p. 689, § 31, effective July 1; (2) amended, p. 1635, § 26, effective July 1. L. 84: (1) and (2) repealed, p. 524, § 2, effective July 1. L. 85: (3) amended, p. 640, § 6, effective July 1. L. 2010: (3) amended, (HB 10-1374), ch. 261, p. 1181, § 4, effective May 25.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 17-1-207 as it existed prior to 1977.

Cross references: For other provisions concerning parole regulations, see § 17-22.5-104.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22 cases, 1979–2019 · leading case: People v. Montgomery, 669 P.2d 1387 (Colo. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Montgomery, 669 P.2d 1387 (Colo. 1983). · cites it 8× “See section 17-2-207(2), C.R.S.1973 (1980 Cum.”
People v. Naranjo, 612 P.2d 1099 (Colo. 1980). · cites it 6× “1973 [current version at section 17-2-207, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl. Vol.”
People v. Drake, 785 P.2d 1257 (Colo. 1990). · cites it 4× “The defendant is also eligible for parole under subsection 17-2-207(2), 8 C.R.S. (1978 & 1983 Supp.”
People v. Garcia, 64 P.3d 857 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 3× “” Section 17-2-207(3), C.R.S.2001. These authorities persuade us that mandatory parolees, like defendant, are in custody for purposes of the escape statute, § 18-8-208(2).”
People v. Naranjo, 612 P.2d 1106 (Colo. 1980). · cites it 6× “1973 [current version at section 17-2-207, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl. Vol.”
People v. Lucero, 772 P.2d 58 (Colo. 1989). · cites it 5× “Also § 17-2-207, C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8A) provides that an offender on parole remains under the legal custody of the Department of Corrections and may be subject at any time to be returned to a correctional facility.”
People v. Sa'Ra, 117 P.3d 51 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “3d at 861 (quoting § 17-2-207(3), C.R.S.2004); see Taylor, supra ; see also People v.”
In re Miranda, 2012 CO 69, 289 P.3d 957. · cites it 2× “§ 17-2-207(8), C.R.S. (2012); People v. Lucero, 772 P.”
People v. Gaskins, 825 P.2d 30 (Colo. 1992). “See § 17-2-207, 8 C.R.S. (1978 & 1983 Supp.).”
People v. Trujillo, 261 P.3d 485 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “In addition, defendant points to two statutes that speak to the custodial status of parolees: section 17-2-207(8), C.R.8.2010 ("{Tolffenders on parole shall remain under legal custody"), and section 17-22.”
People v. Hunter, 738 P.2d 20 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “8A) provides that an offender on parole remains under the legal custody of the Department of Corrections and may be subject at any time to be returned to a correctional facility. Thus, one who is on parole is granted a special privilege to be outside the walls of the institution…”
People v. Campbell, 742 P.2d 302 (Colo. 1987). “§ 17-2-207(3), 8A C.R.S. (1986). He is monitored by an officer of the department and must report periodically to the officer.”
Show all 22 citing cases →
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 17-2-207(2): 4 cases
People v. Drake, 785 P.2d 1257 (Colo. 1990). “The defendant is also eligible for parole under subsection 17-2-207(2), 8 C.R.S. (1978 & 1983 Supp.”
People v. Montgomery, 669 P.2d 1387 (Colo. 1983). “See section 17-2-207(2), C.R.S.1973 (1980 Cum.”
People v. Jones, 604 P.2d 679 (Colo. 1979).
People v. Montgomery, 645 P.2d 283 (Colo. Ct. App. 1981).
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 17-2-207(2)(b): 1 case
People v. Montgomery, 669 P.2d 1387 (Colo. 1983). “See section 17-2-207(2), C.R.S.1973 (1980 Cum.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 17-2-207(3): 6 cases
People v. Garcia, 64 P.3d 857 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002). “” Section 17-2-207(3), C.R.S.2001. These authorities persuade us that mandatory parolees, like defendant, are in custody for purposes of the escape statute, § 18-8-208(2).”
People v. Sa'Ra, 117 P.3d 51 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “3d at 861 (quoting § 17-2-207(3), C.R.S.2004); see Taylor, supra ; see also People v.”
People v. Lucero, 772 P.2d 58 (Colo. 1989). “Also § 17-2-207, C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8A) provides that an offender on parole remains under the legal custody of the Department of Corrections and may be subject at any time to be returned to a correctional facility.”
People v. Campbell, 742 P.2d 302 (Colo. 1987). “§ 17-2-207(3), 8A C.R.S. (1986). He is monitored by an officer of the department and must report periodically to the officer.”
People v. Johnson, 987 P.2d 928 (Colo. Ct. App. 1999).
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 17-2-207(8): 2 cases
In re Miranda, 2012 CO 69, 289 P.3d 957. “§ 17-2-207(8), C.R.S. (2012); People v. Lucero, 772 P.”
People v. Trujillo, 261 P.3d 485 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010). “In addition, defendant points to two statutes that speak to the custodial status of parolees: section 17-2-207(8), C.R.8.2010 ("{Tolffenders on parole shall remain under legal custody"), and section 17-22.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.