Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604 (2026)

Criteria for termination

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) The court may order a termination of the parent-child legal relationship upon the finding by clear and convincing evidence of any one of the following: (a) That the child has been adjudicated dependent or neglected and has been abandoned by the child's parent or parents as follows: (I) That the parent or parents have surrendered physical custody of the child for a period of six months or more and have not manifested during such period the firm intention to resume physical custody of the child or to make permanent legal arrangements for the care of the child except in cases when voluntary placement is renewable under section 19-1-115 (8)(a); (II) That the identity of the parent of the child is unknown and has been unknown for three months or more and that reasonable efforts to identify and locate the parent in accordance with section 19-3-603 have failed; (b) That the child is adjudicated dependent or neglected and the court finds that an appropriate treatment plan cannot be devised to address the unfitness of the parent or parents. In making such a determination, the court shall find one of the following as the basis for unfitness: (I) An emotional illness, a behavioral or mental health disorder, or an intellectual and developmental disability of the parent of such duration or nature as to render the parent unlikely within a reasonable time to care for the ongoing physical, mental, and emotional needs and conditions of the child. The court shall make findings that the provision of reasonable accommodations and modifications pursuant to the federal "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990", 42 U.S.C. sec. 12101 et seq., and its related amendments and implementing regulations, will not remediate the impact of the parent's disability on the health or welfare of the child. (II) A single incident resulting in serious bodily injury or disfigurement of the child; (III) Repealed. (IV) Serious bodily injury or death of a sibling due to proven parental abuse or neglect; (V) An identifiable pattern of habitual abuse to which the child or another child has been subjected and, as a result of which, a court has adjudicated another child as neglected or dependent based upon allegations of sexual or physical abuse, or a court of competent jurisdiction has determined that such abuse has caused the death of another child; (VI) An identifiable pattern of sexual abuse of the child; or (VII) The torture of or extreme cruelty to the child, a sibling of the child, or another child of either parent; (c) That the child or youth is adjudicated dependent or neglected and all of the following exist: (I) That an appropriate treatment plan approved by the court has not been reasonably complied with by the parent or parents or has not been successful or that the court has previously found, pursuant to section 19-3-508 (1)(e), that an appropriate treatment plan could not be devised. In a county designated pursuant to section 19-1-123, if a child or youth is under six years of age at the time a petition is filed in accordance with section 19-3-501 (2), the court shall not find that a parent is or parents are in reasonable compliance with or to have been successful at a court-approved treatment plan when: (A) The parent has not attended family time with the child or youth as set forth in the treatment plan, unless good cause can be shown for failing to attend; or (B) The parent exhibits the same problems addressed in the treatment plan without adequate improvement, including but not limited to improvement in the relationship with the child, and is unable or unwilling to provide nurturing and safe parenting sufficiently adequate to meet the child's physical, emotional, and mental health needs and conditions despite earlier intervention and treatment for the family. The court may receive testimony regarding the family's progress under the treatment plan from the child's physician or therapist, foster parent, educational or religious teachers, CASA volunteer, or caseworker. (II) That the parent is unfit; and (III) That the conduct or condition of the parent or parents is unlikely to change within a reasonable time. (2) In determining unfitness, conduct, or condition for purposes of paragraph (c) of subsection (1) of this section, the court shall find that continuation of the legal relationship between parent and child is likely to result in grave risk of death or serious bodily injury to the child or that the conduct or condition of the parent or parents renders the parent or parents unable or unwilling to give the child reasonable parental care to include, at a minimum, nurturing and safe parenting sufficiently adequate to meet the child's physical, emotional, and mental health needs and conditions. In making such determinations, the court shall consider, but not be limited to, the following: (a) Any one of the bases for a finding of parental unfitness set forth in paragraph (b) of subsection (1) of this section; (b) Conduct towards the child of a physically or sexually abusive nature; (c) History of violent behavior; (d) A single incident of life-threatening or serious bodily injury or disfigurement of the child; (e) Excessive use of intoxicating liquors or controlled substances, as defined in section 18-18-102 (5), C.R.S., which affects the ability to care and provide for the child; (f) Neglect of the child; (g) Injury or death of a sibling due to proven parental abuse or neglect, murder, voluntary manslaughter, or circumstances in which a parent aided, abetted, or attempted the commission of or conspired or solicited to commit murder of a child's sibling; (h) Reasonable efforts by child-caring agencies which have been unable to rehabilitate the parent or parents; (i) That any parent who is a named respondent in the termination proceeding has had prior involvement with the department of human services concerning an incident of abuse or neglect involving the child and a subsequent incident of abuse or neglect occurs; (j) Whether a parent committed felony assault that resulted in serious bodily injury to the child or to another child of the parent; (k) That the child has been in foster care under the responsibility of the county department for fifteen of the most recent twenty-two months, unless: (I) The child is placed with a relative of the child; (II) The county department or a state agency has documented in the case plan, which shall be available for court review, that filing such a motion would not be in the best interests of the child; (III) Where required to make reasonable efforts, services identified as necessary for the safe return of the child to the child's home have not been provided to the family consistent with the time period in the case plan; or (IV) The child has been in foster care under the responsibility of the county department for such period of time due to circumstances beyond the control of the parent such as incarceration of the parent for a reasonable period of time, court delays or continuances that are not attributable to the parent, or such other reasonable circumstances that the court finds are beyond the control of the parent; (l) Whether, on two or more occasions, a child in the physical custody of the parent has been adjudicated dependent or neglected in a proceeding under this article or comparable proceedings under the laws of another state or the federal government; (m) Whether, on one or more prior occasions, a parent has had his or her parent-child legal relationship terminated pursuant to this article or section 19-5-105 or comparable proceedings under the laws of another state or the federal government. (3) In considering the termination of the parent-child legal relationship, the court shall give primary consideration to the physical, mental, and emotional conditions and needs of the child. The court shall review and order, if necessary, an evaluation of the child's physical, mental, and emotional conditions. For the purpose of determining termination of the parent-child legal relationship, written reports and other materials relating to the child's mental, physical, and social history may be received and considered by the court along with other evidence; but the court, if so requested by the child, his parent or guardian, or any other interested party, shall require that the person who wrote the report or prepared the material appear as a witness and be subject to both direct and cross-examination. In the absence of such request, the court may order the person who prepared the report or other material to appear if it finds that the interest of the child so requires.

Source: L. 87: Entire title R&RE, p. 788, § 1, effective October 1. L. 90: (1)(a) amended, p. 1037, § 5, effective April 3. L. 91: (1)(a)(I) amended, p. 1159, § 5, effective July 1. L. 92: (3) amended, p. 224, § 11, effective July 1. L. 94: (1) and IP(2) amended and (2)(i) added, p. 2055, § 8, effective July 1. L. 97: IP(1) and (1)(b) amended, p. 521, § 10, effective July 1; (1)(b) amended, p. 1440, § 16, effective July 1. L. 98: (1)(b), IP(2), (2)(d), and (2)(g) amended and (2)(j) and (2)(k) added, pp. 1419, 1420, §§ 6, 7, effective July 1. L. 2001: (2)(l) and (2)(m) added, p. 499, § 1, effective May 4; (1)(b)(V) and (1)(b)(VI) amended and (1)(b)(VII) added, p. 847, § 10, effective June 1. L. 2003: (1)(c)(I)(B) amended, p. 754, § 6, effective March 25. L. 2008: (1)(a)(I) amended, p. 1894, § 67, effective August 5. L. 2012: (2)(e) amended, (HB 12- 1311), ch. 281, p. 1625, § 61, effective July 1. L. 2017: (1)(b)(I) amended, (HB 17-1046), ch. 50, p. 158, § 10, effective March 16; (1)(b)(I) amended, (SB 17-242), ch. 263, p. 1318, § 167, effective May 25. L. 2018: IP(1)(b) and (1)(b)(I) amended, (HB 18-1104), ch. 164, p. 1135, § 8, effective April 25. L. 2023: IP(1)(c), IP(1)(c)(I), and (1)(c)(I)(A) amended, (HB 23-1027), ch. 284, p. 1683, § 16, effective June 1; (1)(b)(III)(B) added by revision, (SB 23-039), ch. 191, pp. 957, 962 §§ 7, 13.

Editor's note: (1) This section was contained in a title that was repealed and reenacted in 1987. Provisions of this section, as it existed in 1987, are similar to those contained in § 19- 11-105 as said section existed in 1986, the year prior to the repeal and reenactment of this title. (2) Amendments made to subsection (1)(b) by Senate Bill 97-218 and Senate Bill 97-71 were harmonized. (3) Subsection (1)(b)(III)(B) provided for the repeal of subsection (1)(b)(III), effective January 1, 2024. (See L. 2023, pp. 957, 962.)

Cross references: For the legislative declaration contained in the 2001 act amending subsections (1)(b)(V) and (1)(b)(VI) and enacting subsection (1)(b)(VII), see section 1 of chapter 241, Session Laws of Colorado 2001. For the legislative declaration in SB 17-242, see section 1 of chapter 263, Session Laws of Colorado 2017. For the legislative declaration in HB 23-1027, see section 1 of chapter 284, Session Laws of Colorado 2023. For the legislative declaration in SB 23-039, see section 1 of chapter 191, Session Laws of Colorado 2023.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 449 cases (270 in the last 5 years), 1988–2026 · leading case: K.D. v. People, 139 P.3d 695 (Colo. 2006).
K.D. v. People, 139 P.3d 695 (Colo. 2006). · cites it 53× “Second, under section 19-3-604(1)(b), C.R.S. (2005), a trial court may terminate parental rights if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child has been adjudicated dependent or neglected on any ground and that no appropriate treatment plan can be devised to address…”
in Interest of A.R, 2018 COA 177 (Colo. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 15× “¶ 61 A judgment terminating parental rights may be unreliable when, due to counsel’s deficient performance, the court did not receive essential information favorable to the parent that directly related to the termination criteria under section 19-3-604. And, a termination…”
in Interest of L.M, 2018 COA 57 (Colo. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 16× “; see also § 19-3-604(1), C.R.S. 2017. First, a juvenile court may terminate parental rights when the parent has abandoned the child as defined by section 19-3-604(1)(a).”
in Interest of S.R.N.J-S, 2020 COA 12 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 11× “See § 19-3-604; S.N., ¶ 21; see also People in Interest of A.”
People in Interest of L.M, 2018 CO 34 (Colo. 2018). · cites it 20× “(2015), or section 19-3-604, C.R.S. (2015), when terminating the parent-child legal relationship of the non-relinquishing parent after one parent decides to relinquish his or her parental rights to a child subject to dependency and neglect proceedings.”
in Int. of B.H, 2021 CO 39 (Colo. 2021). · cites it 9× “See § 19-3-604(1)(c), C.R.S. (2020).1 ¶19 Along the way, the district court rejected less drastic alternatives to termination.”
People ex rel. J.W. v. C.O., 406 P.3d 853 (Colo. 2017). · cites it 12× “¶29 However, the court of appeals reasoned that, because section 19-3-604(1) requires the court in a termination proceeding to find that the child “has been adjudicated dependent or neglected,” the court does not acquire jurisdiction to terminate a parent-child relationship…”
in the Interest of S.B, 2020 COA 5 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 12× “¶ 73 Second, a parent could claim that her counsel’s deficient performance prevented the juvenile court from receiving essential information favorable to the parent relating to section 19-3-604’s termination criteria. A.”
People ex rel. D.Y., 176 P.3d 874 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 16× “To terminate the parent-child legal relationship pursuant to section 19-3-604(1)(c), C.R.S.2007, clear and convincing evidence must establish, as relevant here, that an appropriate treatment plan, approved by the trial court, has not been reasonably complied with by the parent…”
C.S. v. People, 83 P.3d 627 (Colo. 2004). · cites it 21× “(recognizing that the pertinent protection has been codified under section 19-3-604, 6 C.R.S. (2003)). There, we also concluded that the detailed procedures and criteria provided under the Termination Act adequately protect a parent’s fundamental rights.”
in Interest of S.K, 2019 COA 36 (Colo. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 10× “§ 19-3-604(1)(c), C.R.S. 2018; People in Interest of C.”
in Interest of E.S, 2021 COA 79 (Colo. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 6× “¶1 In determining whether a parent’s parental rights should be terminated under section 19-3-604(1)(c), C.R.S. 2020, following an adjudication that the parent’s children are dependent or neglected, a juvenile court must consider whether the county department of human services…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1) — 32 cases
in Interest of C.B, 2019 COA 168 (Colo. Ct. App. 2019).
in Interest of A.R, 2018 COA 177 (Colo. Ct. App. 2018). “¶ 61 A judgment terminating parental rights may be unreliable when, due to counsel’s deficient performance, the court did not receive essential information favorable to the parent that directly related to the termination criteria under section 19-3-604. And, a termination…”
in the Interest of S.B, 2020 COA 5 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020). “¶ 73 Second, a parent could claim that her counsel’s deficient performance prevented the juvenile court from receiving essential information favorable to the parent relating to section 19-3-604’s termination criteria. A.”
K.D. v. People, 139 P.3d 695 (Colo. 2006). “Second, under section 19-3-604(1)(b), C.R.S. (2005), a trial court may terminate parental rights if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child has been adjudicated dependent or neglected on any ground and that no appropriate treatment plan can be devised to address…”
People ex rel. J.W. v. C.O., 406 P.3d 853 (Colo. 2017). “¶29 However, the court of appeals reasoned that, because section 19-3-604(1) requires the court in a termination proceeding to find that the child “has been adjudicated dependent or neglected,” the court does not acquire jurisdiction to terminate a parent-child relationship…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(a) — 33 cases
in Interest of L.M, 2018 COA 57 (Colo. Ct. App. 2018). “; see also § 19-3-604(1), C.R.S. 2017. First, a juvenile court may terminate parental rights when the parent has abandoned the child as defined by section 19-3-604(1)(a).”
K.D. v. People, 139 P.3d 695 (Colo. 2006). “Second, under section 19-3-604(1)(b), C.R.S. (2005), a trial court may terminate parental rights if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child has been adjudicated dependent or neglected on any ground and that no appropriate treatment plan can be devised to address…”
People in Interest of L.M, 2018 CO 34 (Colo. 2018). “(2015), or section 19-3-604, C.R.S. (2015), when terminating the parent-child legal relationship of the non-relinquishing parent after one parent decides to relinquish his or her parental rights to a child subject to dependency and neglect proceedings.”
A.M. v. A.C., 296 P.3d 1026 (Colo. 2013).
People ex rel. S.N. v. S.N., 329 P.3d 276 (Colo. 2014).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(a)(I) — 12 cases
People ex rel. A.D., 56 P.3d 1246 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).
Peo in Interest of KW (Colo. Ct. App. 2026).
Peo in Interest of JM (Colo. Ct. App. 2025).
Peo in Interest of EG (Colo. Ct. App. 2026).
Peo in Interest of NT (Colo. Ct. App. 2022).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(a)(II) — 1 case
Petition of J.N. (Colo. Ct. App. 2022).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(b) — 34 cases
K.D. v. People, 139 P.3d 695 (Colo. 2006). “Second, under section 19-3-604(1)(b), C.R.S. (2005), a trial court may terminate parental rights if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child has been adjudicated dependent or neglected on any ground and that no appropriate treatment plan can be devised to address…”
People in Interest of L.M, 2018 CO 34 (Colo. 2018). “(2015), or section 19-3-604, C.R.S. (2015), when terminating the parent-child legal relationship of the non-relinquishing parent after one parent decides to relinquish his or her parental rights to a child subject to dependency and neglect proceedings.”
in Interest of IJO, 2019 COA 151 (Colo. Ct. App. 2019).
in Interest of L.M, 2018 COA 57 (Colo. Ct. App. 2018). “; see also § 19-3-604(1), C.R.S. 2017. First, a juvenile court may terminate parental rights when the parent has abandoned the child as defined by section 19-3-604(1)(a).”
People ex rel. Z.P.S., 369 P.3d 814 (Colo. Ct. App. 2016).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(b)(1) — 1 case
People ex rel. C.Z., 360 P.3d 228 (Colo. Ct. App. 2015).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(b)(D) — 1 case
People ex rel. K.D., 155 P.3d 634 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(b)(I) — 13 cases
People ex rel. C.Z., 360 P.3d 228 (Colo. Ct. App. 2015).
in Interest of L.M, 2018 COA 57 (Colo. Ct. App. 2018). “; see also § 19-3-604(1), C.R.S. 2017. First, a juvenile court may terminate parental rights when the parent has abandoned the child as defined by section 19-3-604(1)(a).”
People Ex Rel. Ag, 264 P.3d 615 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010).
People Ex Rel. Kd, 155 P.3d 634 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007).
People ex rel. A.G., 264 P.3d 615 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(b)(I1) — 1 case
People ex rel. Z.P.S., 369 P.3d 814 (Colo. Ct. App. 2016).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(b)(II) — 12 cases
People ex rel. S.G., 91 P.3d 443 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004).
Peo in Interest of RR (Colo. Ct. App. 2025).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(b)(III) — 10 cases
K.D. v. People, 139 P.3d 695 (Colo. 2006). “Second, under section 19-3-604(1)(b), C.R.S. (2005), a trial court may terminate parental rights if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child has been adjudicated dependent or neglected on any ground and that no appropriate treatment plan can be devised to address…”
People in Interest of TT, 845 P.2d 539 (Colo. Ct. App. 1992).
Charleston Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Jackson, 627 S.E.2d 765 (S.C. Ct. App. 2006).
People Ex Rel. Tlb, 148 P.3d 450 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
People ex rel. T.M., 240 P.3d 542 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(b)(IV) — 6 cases
People in Interest of EIC, 958 P.2d 511 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).
People in Interest of TW, 797 P.2d 821 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990).
People ex rel. Z.P.S, 2016 COA 20 (Colo. Ct. App. 2016).
Peo in Interest of GS (Colo. Ct. App. 2025).
Peo in Interest of ETG (Colo. Ct. App. 2026).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(b)(VI) — 1 case
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(c) — 284 cases
in Interest of S.R.N.J-S, 2020 COA 12 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020). “See § 19-3-604; S.N., ¶ 21; see also People in Interest of A.”
in Interest of S.K, 2019 COA 36 (Colo. Ct. App. 2019). “§ 19-3-604(1)(c), C.R.S. 2018; People in Interest of C.”
in Interest of E.S, 2021 COA 79 (Colo. Ct. App. 2021). “¶1 In determining whether a parent’s parental rights should be terminated under section 19-3-604(1)(c), C.R.S. 2020, following an adjudication that the parent’s children are dependent or neglected, a juvenile court must consider whether the county department of human services…”
People in re S.L. & A.L, 2017 COA 160 (Colo. Ct. App. 2017).
in Interest of A.R, 2018 COA 177 (Colo. Ct. App. 2018). “¶ 61 A judgment terminating parental rights may be unreliable when, due to counsel’s deficient performance, the court did not receive essential information favorable to the parent that directly related to the termination criteria under section 19-3-604. And, a termination…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(c)(1) — 1 case
in the Interest of My.K.M, 2021 COA 33 (Colo. Ct. App. 2021).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(c)(1)(A) — 1 case
Peo In Interest of NEM (Colo. Ct. App. 2025).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(c)(B) — 1 case
Peo in Interest of AM (Colo. Ct. App. 2025).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(c)(I) — 33 cases
in Interest of S.R.N.J-S, 2020 COA 12 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020). “See § 19-3-604; S.N., ¶ 21; see also People in Interest of A.”
People ex rel. D.Y., 176 P.3d 874 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007). “To terminate the parent-child legal relationship pursuant to section 19-3-604(1)(c), C.R.S.2007, clear and convincing evidence must establish, as relevant here, that an appropriate treatment plan, approved by the trial court, has not been reasonably complied with by the parent…”
in Interest of A.R, 2018 COA 177 (Colo. Ct. App. 2018). “¶ 61 A judgment terminating parental rights may be unreliable when, due to counsel’s deficient performance, the court did not receive essential information favorable to the parent that directly related to the termination criteria under section 19-3-604. And, a termination…”
in the Interest of S.B, 2020 COA 5 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020). “¶ 73 Second, a parent could claim that her counsel’s deficient performance prevented the juvenile court from receiving essential information favorable to the parent relating to section 19-3-604’s termination criteria. A.”
People in the Interest of A.N-B, 2019 COA 46 (Colo. Ct. App. 2019).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(c)(I)(A) — 12 cases
People Ex Rel. Aj, 143 P.3d 1143 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
People Ex Rel. Mt, 121 P.3d 309 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
People Ex Rel. Jas, 160 P.3d 257 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(c)(I)(B) — 16 cases
A.M. v. A.C., 296 P.3d 1026 (Colo. 2013).
People ex rel. T.D., 140 P.3d 205 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
People Ex Rel. M.M., Jr., 215 P.3d 1237 (Colo. Ct. App. 2009).
People Ex Rel. Td, 140 P.3d 205 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
E.S v. v. People in the Interest of C.E.M, 2016 CO 40 (Colo. 2016).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(c)(I)(b) — 1 case
K.D. v. People, 139 P.3d 695 (Colo. 2006). “Second, under section 19-3-604(1)(b), C.R.S. (2005), a trial court may terminate parental rights if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child has been adjudicated dependent or neglected on any ground and that no appropriate treatment plan can be devised to address…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(c)(II) — 19 cases
People ex rel. D.Y., 176 P.3d 874 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007). “To terminate the parent-child legal relationship pursuant to section 19-3-604(1)(c), C.R.S.2007, clear and convincing evidence must establish, as relevant here, that an appropriate treatment plan, approved by the trial court, has not been reasonably complied with by the parent…”
in Interest of S.R.N.J-S, 2020 COA 12 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020). “See § 19-3-604; S.N., ¶ 21; see also People in Interest of A.”
People in the Interest of J.G, 2016 CO 39 (Colo. 2016).
People in re C.Y, 2018 COA 50 (Colo. Ct. App. 2018).
People ex rel. A.M., 310 P.3d 89 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(c)(III) — 27 cases
People in the Interest of J.G, 2016 CO 39 (Colo. 2016).
People v. M.L., 370 P.3d 1151 (Colo. 2016).
People in Interest of EH, 837 P.2d 284 (Colo. Ct. App. 1992).
People ex rel. E.H., 837 P.2d 284 (Colo. Ct. App. 1992).
Peo in Interest of NLG (Colo. Ct. App. 2024).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(c)(IIl) — 1 case
People ex rel. A.J.L., 243 P.3d 244 (Colo. 2010).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(c)(i)(II) — 1 case
Peo In Interest of NEM (Colo. Ct. App. 2025).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(ce) — 1 case
People ex rel. A.G., 264 P.3d 615 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(e) — 1 case
K.D. v. People, 139 P.3d 695 (Colo. 2006). “Second, under section 19-3-604(1)(b), C.R.S. (2005), a trial court may terminate parental rights if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child has been adjudicated dependent or neglected on any ground and that no appropriate treatment plan can be devised to address…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(1)(e)(I)(A) — 1 case
People ex rel. A.J., 143 P.3d 1143 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(2) — 64 cases
K.D. v. People, 139 P.3d 695 (Colo. 2006). “Second, under section 19-3-604(1)(b), C.R.S. (2005), a trial court may terminate parental rights if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child has been adjudicated dependent or neglected on any ground and that no appropriate treatment plan can be devised to address…”
People ex rel. D.Y., 176 P.3d 874 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007). “To terminate the parent-child legal relationship pursuant to section 19-3-604(1)(c), C.R.S.2007, clear and convincing evidence must establish, as relevant here, that an appropriate treatment plan, approved by the trial court, has not been reasonably complied with by the parent…”
in Interest of S.R.N.J-S, 2020 COA 12 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020). “See § 19-3-604; S.N., ¶ 21; see also People in Interest of A.”
People ex rel. C.T.S., 140 P.3d 332 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
in the Interest of S.B, 2020 COA 5 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020). “¶ 73 Second, a parent could claim that her counsel’s deficient performance prevented the juvenile court from receiving essential information favorable to the parent relating to section 19-3-604’s termination criteria. A.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(2)(a) — 11 cases
K.D. v. People, 139 P.3d 695 (Colo. 2006). “Second, under section 19-3-604(1)(b), C.R.S. (2005), a trial court may terminate parental rights if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child has been adjudicated dependent or neglected on any ground and that no appropriate treatment plan can be devised to address…”
People ex rel. D.L.C., 70 P.3d 584 (Colo. Ct. App. 2003).
C.S. v. People, 83 P.3d 627 (Colo. 2004). “(recognizing that the pertinent protection has been codified under section 19-3-604, 6 C.R.S. (2003)). There, we also concluded that the detailed procedures and criteria provided under the Termination Act adequately protect a parent’s fundamental rights.”
People ex rel. D.G., 140 P.3d 299 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
People ex rel. L.A.C., 97 P.3d 363 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(2)(b) — 3 cases
in Interest of L.M, 2018 COA 57 (Colo. Ct. App. 2018). “; see also § 19-3-604(1), C.R.S. 2017. First, a juvenile court may terminate parental rights when the parent has abandoned the child as defined by section 19-3-604(1)(a).”
People ex rel. A.R., 310 P.3d 1007 (Colo. Ct. App. 2012).
People ex rel. J.A.S., 160 P.3d 257 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(2)(bh) — 1 case
People ex rel. N.D.V., 224 P.3d 410 (Colo. Ct. App. 2009).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(2)(c) — 3 cases
People ex rel. C.T.S., 140 P.3d 332 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
Peo in Interest of AG (Colo. Ct. App. 2024).
Peo in Interest of ZJ (Colo. Ct. App. 2026).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(2)(d) — 1 case
In the Matter of Ndv, 224 P.3d 410 (Colo. Ct. App. 2009).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(2)(e) — 14 cases
People ex rel. K.T., 129 P.3d 1080 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
People Ex Rel. Kt, 129 P.3d 1080 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
Peo in Interest of XH (Colo. Ct. App. 2025).
People in Interest of C.N.T. (Colo. Ct. App. 2026).
Peo in Int of SZS (Colo. Ct. App. 2022).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(2)(f) — 3 cases
People Ex Rel. Dp, 181 P.3d 403 (Colo. Ct. App. 2008).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(2)(h) — 61 cases
in Int. of B.H, 2021 CO 39 (Colo. 2021). “See § 19-3-604(1)(c), C.R.S. (2020).1 ¶19 Along the way, the district court rejected less drastic alternatives to termination.”
People, 305 P.3d 414 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013).
People ex rel. D.Y., 176 P.3d 874 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007). “To terminate the parent-child legal relationship pursuant to section 19-3-604(1)(c), C.R.S.2007, clear and convincing evidence must establish, as relevant here, that an appropriate treatment plan, approved by the trial court, has not been reasonably complied with by the parent…”
in Interest of E.S, 2021 COA 79 (Colo. Ct. App. 2021). “¶1 In determining whether a parent’s parental rights should be terminated under section 19-3-604(1)(c), C.R.S. 2020, following an adjudication that the parent’s children are dependent or neglected, a juvenile court must consider whether the county department of human services…”
in Interest of A.R, 2018 COA 177 (Colo. Ct. App. 2018). “¶ 61 A judgment terminating parental rights may be unreliable when, due to counsel’s deficient performance, the court did not receive essential information favorable to the parent that directly related to the termination criteria under section 19-3-604. And, a termination…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(2)(i) — 3 cases
Peo in Interest of GWT (Colo. Ct. App. 2024).
Peo in Interest of JMQ (Colo. Ct. App. 2025).
Peo in Interest of DJC (Colo. Ct. App. 2026).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(2)(k) — 7 cases
K.D. v. People, 139 P.3d 695 (Colo. 2006). “Second, under section 19-3-604(1)(b), C.R.S. (2005), a trial court may terminate parental rights if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child has been adjudicated dependent or neglected on any ground and that no appropriate treatment plan can be devised to address…”
C.S. v. People, 83 P.3d 627 (Colo. 2004). “(recognizing that the pertinent protection has been codified under section 19-3-604, 6 C.R.S. (2003)). There, we also concluded that the detailed procedures and criteria provided under the Termination Act adequately protect a parent’s fundamental rights.”
People Ex Rel. Ag, 264 P.3d 615 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010).
People ex rel. A.G., 264 P.3d 615 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010).
People Ex Rel. Rd, 277 P.3d 889 (Colo. Ct. App. 2012).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(2)(k)(III) — 1 case
Peo in Interest of CP (Colo. Ct. App. 2022).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(2)(k)(IV) — 1 case
K.D. v. People, 139 P.3d 695 (Colo. 2006). “Second, under section 19-3-604(1)(b), C.R.S. (2005), a trial court may terminate parental rights if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child has been adjudicated dependent or neglected on any ground and that no appropriate treatment plan can be devised to address…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(2)(l) — 2 cases
People in re C.Y, 2018 COA 50 (Colo. Ct. App. 2018).
Peo in Interest of ZJ (Colo. Ct. App. 2026).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(2)(m) — 1 case
Peo in Interest of VF-MA (Colo. Ct. App. 2024).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(3) — 169 cases
K.D. v. People, 139 P.3d 695 (Colo. 2006). “Second, under section 19-3-604(1)(b), C.R.S. (2005), a trial court may terminate parental rights if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child has been adjudicated dependent or neglected on any ground and that no appropriate treatment plan can be devised to address…”
in Interest of A.M, 2021 CO 14 (Colo. 2021).
in the Interest of S.B, 2020 COA 5 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020). “¶ 73 Second, a parent could claim that her counsel’s deficient performance prevented the juvenile court from receiving essential information favorable to the parent relating to section 19-3-604’s termination criteria. A.”
in Interest of S.R.N.J-S, 2020 COA 12 (Colo. Ct. App. 2020). “See § 19-3-604; S.N., ¶ 21; see also People in Interest of A.”
in Interest of A.R, 2018 COA 177 (Colo. Ct. App. 2018). “¶ 61 A judgment terminating parental rights may be unreliable when, due to counsel’s deficient performance, the court did not receive essential information favorable to the parent that directly related to the termination criteria under section 19-3-604. And, a termination…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(8) — 12 cases
People ex rel. D.L.C., 70 P.3d 584 (Colo. Ct. App. 2003).
People ex rel. A.J.L., 243 P.3d 244 (Colo. 2010).
L.A.N. Ex Rel. L.A.N. v. L.M.B., 292 P.3d 942 (Colo. 2013).
People ex rel. A.M., 310 P.3d 89 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010).
People ex rel. E.S., 49 P.3d 1221 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(c)(I) — 1 case
E.S v. v. People in the Interest of C.E.M, 2016 CO 40 (Colo. 2016).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(c)(I)(B) — 1 case
Peo in Interest of H-SKR (Colo. Ct. App. 2026).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(l)(a) — 3 cases
People ex rel. K.T., 129 P.3d 1080 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
People ex rel. T.L.B., 148 P.3d 450 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
In the Interest of R.J.A., 994 P.2d 470 (Colo. Ct. App. 1999).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(l)(a)(I) — 1 case
K.D. v. People, 139 P.3d 695 (Colo. 2006). “Second, under section 19-3-604(1)(b), C.R.S. (2005), a trial court may terminate parental rights if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child has been adjudicated dependent or neglected on any ground and that no appropriate treatment plan can be devised to address…”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(l)(b) — 8 cases
People ex rel. D.Y., 176 P.3d 874 (Colo. Ct. App. 2007). “To terminate the parent-child legal relationship pursuant to section 19-3-604(1)(c), C.R.S.2007, clear and convincing evidence must establish, as relevant here, that an appropriate treatment plan, approved by the trial court, has not been reasonably complied with by the parent…”
People in Interest of EIC, 958 P.2d 511 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).
People ex rel. Z.P.S., 369 P.3d 814 (Colo. Ct. App. 2016).
People ex rel. T.L.B., 148 P.3d 450 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
People ex rel. D.C-M.S., 111 P.3d 559 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(l)(b)(I) — 5 cases
C.S. v. People, 83 P.3d 627 (Colo. 2004). “(recognizing that the pertinent protection has been codified under section 19-3-604, 6 C.R.S. (2003)). There, we also concluded that the detailed procedures and criteria provided under the Termination Act adequately protect a parent’s fundamental rights.”
People ex rel. S.J.C., 776 P.2d 1103 (Colo. 1989).
People in Interest of EIC, 958 P.2d 511 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).
People in Interest of CSM, 805 P.2d 1129 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990).
People ex rel. D.C-M.S., 111 P.3d 559 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(l)(b)(III) — 6 cases
People in Interest of EIC, 958 P.2d 511 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).
In Re Catholic Charities & Cmty. Servs., 942 P.2d 1380 (Colo. Ct. App. 1997).
People ex rel. D.G., 140 P.3d 299 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
People ex rel. M.S., 129 P.3d 1086 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
People ex rel. T.L.B., 148 P.3d 450 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(l)(c) — 13 cases
People ex rel. J.W. v. C.O., 406 P.3d 853 (Colo. 2017). “¶29 However, the court of appeals reasoned that, because section 19-3-604(1) requires the court in a termination proceeding to find that the child “has been adjudicated dependent or neglected,” the court does not acquire jurisdiction to terminate a parent-child relationship…”
K.D. v. People, 139 P.3d 695 (Colo. 2006). “Second, under section 19-3-604(1)(b), C.R.S. (2005), a trial court may terminate parental rights if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child has been adjudicated dependent or neglected on any ground and that no appropriate treatment plan can be devised to address…”
C.S. v. People, 83 P.3d 627 (Colo. 2004). “(recognizing that the pertinent protection has been codified under section 19-3-604, 6 C.R.S. (2003)). There, we also concluded that the detailed procedures and criteria provided under the Termination Act adequately protect a parent’s fundamental rights.”
People ex rel. C.T.S., 140 P.3d 332 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
People Ex Rel. A.G.-G., 899 P.2d 319 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(l)(c)(I) — 4 cases
People ex rel. J.W. v. C.O., 406 P.3d 853 (Colo. 2017). “¶29 However, the court of appeals reasoned that, because section 19-3-604(1) requires the court in a termination proceeding to find that the child “has been adjudicated dependent or neglected,” the court does not acquire jurisdiction to terminate a parent-child relationship…”
C.S. v. People, 83 P.3d 627 (Colo. 2004). “(recognizing that the pertinent protection has been codified under section 19-3-604, 6 C.R.S. (2003)). There, we also concluded that the detailed procedures and criteria provided under the Termination Act adequately protect a parent’s fundamental rights.”
People ex rel. M.S., 129 P.3d 1086 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
People ex rel. D.C-M.S., 111 P.3d 559 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(l)(c)(I)(A) — 2 cases
People ex rel. M.T., 121 P.3d 309 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
People ex rel. A.J., 143 P.3d 1143 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(l)(c)(I)(B) — 1 case
People ex rel. B.C., 122 P.3d 1067 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(l)(c)(II) — 1 case
People ex rel. D.G., 140 P.3d 299 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(l)(c)(III) — 2 cases
C.S. v. People, 83 P.3d 627 (Colo. 2004). “(recognizing that the pertinent protection has been codified under section 19-3-604, 6 C.R.S. (2003)). There, we also concluded that the detailed procedures and criteria provided under the Termination Act adequately protect a parent’s fundamental rights.”
People ex rel. O.J.S., 844 P.2d 1230 (Colo. Ct. App. 1992).
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 19-3-604(l)(e) — 3 cases
People Ex Rel. A.N.W., 976 P.2d 365 (Colo. Ct. App. 1999).
People ex rel. L.A.C., 97 P.3d 363 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004).
People ex rel. M.S., 129 P.3d 1086 (Colo. Ct. App. 2005).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.